2011 will be an even better year for HBGary, I hear. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EthXpwocm3w

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
That'll do. Understand you guys have a style guide.

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
let me use some kind of language like "an informal spokesman." I get the no titles thing. but bloomberg has a stuff way of writing and will need something like the above. it's the same reason housh gets referred to as a spokesman all the time, i imagine.

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At:  2/08 16:46:36

One more thing; just noticed I'm referred to as spokesman. That's not
entirely accurate. Gregg Housh serves same role as I do in terms of being a
namefag who talks to press, and Anon doesn't have roles or titles. As I
mentioned, I'm a propagandist, but just one of many, and though I'm
organizing legal counsel, I don't have official capacity in regards to that.
NYT refers to me simply as "Barrett Brown," for instance.

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

> You have the link to main file, right? I'm compiling best ones today.
> http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6156166/HBGary_leaked_email
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
>> of course.
>>
>> and let's talk later about the emails...
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Michael Riley
>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> (202) 624 1982
>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> At:  2/08 16:33:48
>>
>> Thanks, man.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>
>> > ok. removing it now. It will take a bit to go thru the system...
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Michael Riley
>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > (202) 624 1982
>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > At:  2/08 16:09:22
>> >
>> > No is fine. I provided you with inaccurate info insomuch as that rabbit
>> is
>> > not the same as no insomuch as rabbit is two people.
>> > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <michaelriley@bloomberg.net
>> >
>> > Date: 08 Feb 2011 15:44:05
>> > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
>> >
>> > I'll do my best. Maybe I can use the sister thing. I'll get right back
>> to
>> > you.
>> >
>> > Should she just be id'd as 'no'? Or better not to use her handle?
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Michael Riley
>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > (202) 624 1982
>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > At:  2/08 15:38:51
>> >
>> > Also, quick favor - take down "rabbit" from article. She meant to keep
>> the
>> > name secret and I didn't realize.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > that looks juicy...
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Michael Riley
>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > At:  2/08 15:13:12
>> > >
>> > > ttp://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/02/08/darpa/darpa.pdf
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > A victory worthy of a bad film with two-dimensional villains and
>> plucky
>> > > > young heroes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Yeah, I'll get with you soon on the HBGary business. Will see what
>> else
>> > > > we've got.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:39 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:
>> <
>> > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hey, Barrett. So, Owen emailed me and I sent him a couple of
>> > questions.
>> > > >> We'll see if he responds.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Karen was really pissed yesterday when I called again about the
>> email.
>> > > She
>> > > >> basically hung up on me. But what a disaster for HBGary. They'll
>> never
>> > > get
>> > > >> another client.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> So, BusinessWeek (it's part of the bloomberg empire) is interested
>> in
>> > > just
>> > > >> that part of the story...how a security company that was trying to
>> > make
>> > > a
>> > > >> little bank off of Anonymous basically got smacked.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> We already published a story with the Aaron-Greg-Karen email about
>> > > making
>> > > >> him look like a public hero on 60 Minutes. Lol.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I'm going to jump on and see what else is in the emails, but stuff
>> may
>> > > >> come your way that is really interesting. If so, would you mind
>> giving
>> > > me a
>> > > >> heads up? Company secrets...stuff on clients...whatever it is.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cheers,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> Michael Riley
>> > > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> At:  2/07 23:50:31
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Barrett Brown <
>> barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >
>> > http://crowdleaks.org/anonymous-retaliates-against-hbgary-espionage/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Barrett Brown <
>> barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> Also, I recorded the call, as well as the one with Penny, and
>> did
>> > so
>> > > >> here
>> > > >> >> in Texas where I'm allowed to do so.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>> NEWSROOM:
>> > <
>> > > >> >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>> Nice.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Thanks again.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> At:  2/07 20:05:55
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Download an IRC client like Icechat and come to
>> > > irc.anonops.ru#ophbgary
>> > > >> >>> or
>> > > >> >>> #reporters. Someone will help you.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Also, I probably noted that Aaron was telling me last night
>> that
>> > > >> wasn't
>> > > >> >>> attempting to hurt us. Please see this draft of a Crowdleaks
>> > > article,
>> > > >> >>> which
>> > > >> >>> includes an e-mail in which Aaron brags about various things.
>> > > >> >>> https://uloadr.com/u/55.png
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>> > NEWSROOM:
>> > > <
>> > > >> >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > Thanks for the tip.
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > I haven't tried it myself but will tonight. How exactly do I
>> > find
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> > emails? I'd like to get in the queue and have a look what's
>> in
>> > > >> there...
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > Cheers,
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > At:  2/07 18:30:43
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > I'd hurry on the e-mail, though, they're going through all of
>> > them
>> > > >> on
>> > > >> >>> IRC
>> > > >> >>> > and reporters are in. Luckily there are lots of e-mails, lol.
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>> > > NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> <
>> > > >> >>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > nice. thank you.
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > At:  2/07 18:13:57
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > Attached, a screenshot of that e-mail thread. Enjoy.
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > > Dude, I have so many enemies at this point that I can't
>> even
>> > > >> >>> remember
>> > > >> >>> > > their
>> > > >> >>> > > > names. Also, lol @ Karen.
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> <
>> > > >> >>> > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> terrific. thanks. funny story: i asked karen about the
>> > email
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> >>> she
>> > > >> >>> > > said
>> > > >> >>> > > >> that she didn't know anything about it. that's before i
>> > knew
>> > > it
>> > > >> >>> was
>> > > >> >>> > > >> addressed to her.
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> it is going to be hard to deny knowledge when she read
>> it
>> > in
>> > > >> her
>> > > >> >>> inbox
>> > > >> >>> > > on
>> > > >> >>> > > >> saturday.
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> remind me never to get on your bad side. lol.
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> At:  2/07 17:57:07
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> <greg@hbgary.com> Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM
>> > > >> >>> > > >> To: Karen Burke <karen@hbgary.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Cc: Aaron Barr <aaron@hbgary.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show
>> > > original
>> > > >> >>> > > >> I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would
>> be
>> > > >> >>> interesting
>> > > >> >>> > > >> to leave the soft impression that Aaron is the one
>> thatgot
>> > > >> them,
>> > > >> >>> and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> that without Aaron the Feds would have never been able
>> to
>> > get
>> > > >> out
>> > > >> >>> of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> their own way. So, position Aaron as a hero to the
>> public.
>> > At
>> > > >> this
>> > > >> >>> > > >> point they are going to get arrested anyway. But, Aaron
>> has
>> > > >> some
>> > > >> >>> > > >> concerns on how that might affect commerical business
>> > > (although
>> > > >> >>> I'm
>> > > >> >>> > > >> not clear on why yet)
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> NEWSROOM: <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > I just have a couple of questions about the email. My
>> > > editors
>> > > >> >>> want
>> > > >> >>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> get
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > as much authentication as we can.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > what is that address of the account that it's from --
>> > > greg's
>> > > >> >>> > account,
>> > > >> >>> > > i
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > guess (i assume it's on corporate email but could be
>> them
>> > > >> using
>> > > >> >>> a
>> > > >> >>> > > public
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > email server, i suppose). and who was the email
>> address
>> > to?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > and is it formatted in the way you guys have it? in
>> other
>> > > >> words,
>> > > >> >>> can
>> > > >> >>> > > we
>> > > >> >>> > > >> see
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > the whole thing with the to, from, su, etc?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > At:  2/07 17:34:57
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Okay, but only because I like you. I gave OWen your
>> > e-mail,
>> > > >> >>> he'll be
>> > > >> >>> > > in
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > touch soon.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Okay. I'll put that in the story. that's great
>> stuff.
>> > can
>> > > >> we
>> > > >> >>> have
>> > > >> >>> > > that
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > exclusively?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > At:  2/07 17:08:01
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > And that e-mail is timestamped  Sat, feb 5, 9.02am.
>> > Still
>> > > >> >>> bugging
>> > > >> >>> > > Owen
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > for
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > state.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> >>> > barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > Meanwhile, having gone through the e-mails that
>> were
>> > > >> >>> acquired,
>> > > >> >>> > we
>> > > >> >>> > > >> have
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > discovered the following message from Greg at
>> HBGary
>> > > >> >>> Federal:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > "I think these guys are going to get arrested, it
>> > would
>> > > >> be
>> > > >> >>> > > >> interesting
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > toleave the soft impression that Aaron is the one
>> > that
>> > > >> got
>> > > >> >>> them,
>> > > >> >>> > > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > thatwithout Aaron the Feds would have never been
>> able
>> > > to
>> > > >> get
>> > > >> >>> out
>> > > >> >>> > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > theirown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > way.So, position Aaron as a hero to the public.
>> But
>> > > point
>> > > >> >>> they
>> > > >> >>> > are
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > going
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some concerns
>> on
>> > > how
>> > > >> >>> that
>> > > >> >>> > > might
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > affect
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > commerical business although not clear on why yet"
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > Mail ID:  mail 1297012949.M839500P25652Q2423
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> >>> > > barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> "no they did not seize a server form me. just
>> > acouple
>> > > of
>> > > >> my
>> > > >> >>> > boxes
>> > > >> >>> > > >> and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> CD/DVDs
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> [16:00] <owen> also my blakcberry"
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> Still waiting for him to tell me what state.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>> > > >> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> thx. i'm trying to run the story this evening
>> (so
>> > it
>> > > >> shows
>> > > >> >>> up
>> > > >> >>> > on
>> > > >> >>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > web
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> early tomorrow). Let me know as soon as possible
>> > what
>> > > >> you
>> > > >> >>> > get...
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> At:  2/07 17:00:26
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> I've sent him a message asking, will let you
>> know.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>> > > >> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> NEWSROOM: <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > ok. if you could confirm if they took the
>> server.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > And I just need the a state for Owen. We can
>> just
>> > > use
>> > > >> >>> his
>> > > >> >>> > > cyber
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > handle,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> but
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > i need to show where the FBI seized the stuff.
>> > Not
>> > > a
>> > > >> >>> city.
>> > > >> >>> > > Just
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > state.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > At:  2/07 16:42:08
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > No, Owen isn't in NYC. That's one of the many
>> > > things
>> > > >> >>> that
>> > > >> >>> > > Aaron
>> > > >> >>> > > >> got
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> wrong,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > including my supposed other handles. I've
>> heard
>> > > from
>> > > >> one
>> > > >> >>> > > fellow
>> > > >> >>> > > >> who
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> plans
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > sue.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > The feds took quite a bit of equipment from
>> Owen
>> > > but
>> > > >> not
>> > > >> >>> all
>> > > >> >>> > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> it.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Pretty
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > sure they took a server but want to confirm
>> > before
>> > > I
>> > > >> say
>> > > >> >>> yes
>> > > >> >>> > > or
>> > > >> >>> > > >> no.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > owen is in new york state, is that right?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > And did the fbi actually take the server?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > At:  2/07 15:27:56
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Basically, we got hbgary's e-mails along
>> with
>> > > >> hbgary
>> > > >> >>> > > >> federal's.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Prez,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > penny, called me to make the distinction. I
>> > told
>> > > >> her
>> > > >> >>> to
>> > > >> >>> > come
>> > > >> >>> > > >> into
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > irc
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > talk. She and greg whatshisname, who is a
>> > douche,
>> > > >> were
>> > > >> >>> in
>> > > >> >>> > > for
>> > > >> >>> > > >> a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> couple
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > hours. I don't think a consensus has been
>> > reached
>> > > >> on
>> > > >> >>> our
>> > > >> >>> > end
>> > > >> >>> > > >> as
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> regards
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > what
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > to do, but anyway I don't think the e-mails
>> > have
>> > > >> yet
>> > > >> >>> been
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > downloaded
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> by
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > anyone because file isn't being sufficiently
>> > > seeded
>> > > >> >>> via
>> > > >> >>> > > >> torrent,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > so
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> there
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > may still be time to come to a decision. I
>> like
>> > > >> penny
>> > > >> >>> but
>> > > >> >>> > > some
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > others
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > don't
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > trust her on this matter when she claims to
>> be
>> > > >> angry
>> > > >> >>> with
>> > > >> >>> > > >> aaron,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > etc.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Meanwhile greg has made some threatening
>> > > statements
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> press
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > so,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > yeah,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > that wasn't particularly brilliant of him.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:"
>> <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 15:21:01
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > I bet. Busy I mean.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Can you tell me what the negotiations are
>> > about?
>> > > I
>> > > >> can
>> > > >> >>> put
>> > > >> >>> > a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > couple
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > graphs in the story...
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > At:  2/07 15:02:32
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Don't have it yet, will try. Been busy.
>> Spoke
>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > principals
>> > > >> >>> > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > hbgary
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > last
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > night, negotiations, etc.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:"
>> <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 10:17:08
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Subject: rabbit/no search warrant
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Hey Barrett. Do you have a scanned copy of
>> the
>> > > >> search
>> > > >> >>> > > warrant
>> > > >> >>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> feds
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > gave
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > rabbit/no during the search?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > At:  2/06 20:50:33
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/2/6/941730/-Anonymous-pwns-HBGary-Federal
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Barrett
>> Brown <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > Also, we've acquired the document that
>> HBGary
>> > > was
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> >>> > sell
>> > > >> >>> > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> FBI.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > I'm
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > mentioned a couple of times, including an
>> > > >> occasion
>> > > >> >>> on
>> > > >> >>> > > which
>> > > >> >>> > > >> I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > asked
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > people
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > to attend a meeting on building dark nets.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > http://hizost.com/d/zjb
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Barrett
>> Brown
>> > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Also, Anon has taken down HBGary's
>> website,
>> > > >> >>> acquired
>> > > >> >>> > > 60,000
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> e-mails,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> destroyed backup files, acquired Barr's
>> > > Twitter
>> > > >> (
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > https://twitter.com/#!/aaronbarr/status/34395565458456576
>> > > >> >>> > > >> ),
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> more.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Barr is currently in
>> irc.anonops.rupleading
>> > > >> with
>> > > >> >>> us.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Barrett
>> > Brown
>> > > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Michael-
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> You may have seen yesterday's Financial
>> > Times
>> > > >> >>> piece
>> > > >> >>> > > which
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > claimed
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > that
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> the operational heads of Anonymous had
>> been
>> > > >> >>> identified
>> > > >> >>> > > by
>> > > >> >>> > > >> a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> certain
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Aaron
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Barr of the internet secuity firm HBGary
>> > > >> Federal.
>> > > >> >>> Barr
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > claimed
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> that Q
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > is
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> co-founder of Anonymous, which is
>> > > demonstrably
>> > > >> >>> false
>> > > >> >>> > (Q
>> > > >> >>> > > >> set
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > up
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> #anonymous channel at anonops.ru, which
>> is
>> > > >> simply
>> > > >> >>> an
>> > > >> >>> > > IRC
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> channel)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> that he is seeking replacements for
>> OWen.
>> > > OWen
>> > > >> >>> merely
>> > > >> >>> > > runs
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> owns
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > that
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> particular server, which as I told you
>> is
>> > one
>> > > >> of
>> > > >> >>> > several
>> > > >> >>> > > >> de
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > facto
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> operational centers. Everyone involved
>> > > laughed
>> > > >> >>> their
>> > > >> >>> > > >> assess
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > off
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > yesterday
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> and several of us wrote a silly press
>> > release
>> > > >> >>> which
>> > > >> >>> > was
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> thereafter
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > posted at
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Daily Kos and AnonNews. Barr, for his
>> part,
>> > > is
>> > > >> >>> > > reportedly
>> > > >> >>> > > >> set
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> meet
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > with
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> the FBI tomorrow in order to provide
>> them
>> > > with
>> > > >> >>> info
>> > > >> >>> > > >> gleaned
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > from
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> our
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> entirely non-secret IRC channels, and
>> > > meanwhile
>> > > >> >>> his
>> > > >> >>> > > >> allegedly
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > successful
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> intel operation will no doubt help his
>> firm
>> > > >> >>> acquire
>> > > >> >>> > > >> further
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> business.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> The only problem is that Anonymous has
>> just
>> > > >> taken
>> > > >> >>> over
>> > > >> >>> > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> website of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> HBGary Federal founder Greg Hoglund and
>> > > deleted
>> > > >> >>> all
>> > > >> >>> > > >> bakcups.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Suffice
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > say
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> that HBGary has attempted to interfere
>> with
>> > a
>> > > >> >>> movement
>> > > >> >>> > > >> that
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > has
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> made
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> substantial contributions to the liberty
>> > and
>> > > >> >>> > well-being
>> > > >> >>> > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > North
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Africans
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> and others and will be further dealt
>> with
>> > > over
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> > > coming
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > hours.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > Please
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > see:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> http://rootkit.com/. Enjoy the rest of
>> > your
>> > > >> >>> weekend.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM,
>> barri2009 <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> G. Whitney Leigh of Gonzalez and Leigh
>> has
>> > > >> taken
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> case.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > His
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > partner
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> was Ralph Nader's running mate. He'll
>> be
>> > > >> bringing
>> > > >> >>> in
>> > > >> >>> > > some
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > "heavy
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > hitters,"
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> as he put it. Am still scheduled to
>> speak
>> > to
>> > > >> >>> Stanley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Cohen
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> tomorrow,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > after
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> which I'll put the two in touch. The
>> EFF
>> > had
>> > > >> said
>> > > >> >>> > > they'd
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > assist
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> once
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > we had
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> a confirmed name and have just let them
>> > > know.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>> > NEWSROOM:"
>> > > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Date: 04 Feb 2011 15:15:35
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Subject: Re: do you have a couple of
>> > minutes
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> >>> chat
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Thx. I'll keep that off the record but
>> > will
>> > > >> keep
>> > > >> >>> in
>> > > >> >>> > > touch
>> > > >> >>> > > >> as
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > date
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> gets closer.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---- Original Message ----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: Barrett Brown <
>> barriticus@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> At: 2/4/2011 15:11
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Yeah, will do. Also, off the record,
>> > > although
>> > > >> >>> > Anonymous
>> > > >> >>> > > >> as a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > movement
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> will
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> no doubt continue to some small extent
>> > with
>> > > >> >>> Yemen,
>> > > >> >>> > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> 11th
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > is
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> anniversary of Iran's revolution and
>> I'm
>> > in
>> > > >> >>> > discussions
>> > > >> >>> > > >> with
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> both
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iranian
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> exiles and some of the more competent
>> > Anons
>> > > >> about
>> > > >> >>> > > >> supplying
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> certain
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> tools to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Green folks ahead of that, and perhaps
>> > > getting
>> > > >> >>> > involved
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > further.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Our
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> concern
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> is that Anonymous is not yet equipped
>> to
>> > > >> handle
>> > > >> >>> such
>> > > >> >>> > a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > situation
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> as
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iran,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> which obviously involves a lot of
>> nuance
>> > and
>> > > >> >>> > > interference
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > from
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> all
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> great
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> powers and then some. Eritrea,
>> meanwhile,
>> > is
>> > > a
>> > > >> >>> police
>> > > >> >>> > > >> state
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > with
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > large
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> expat presence in the city in which I'm
>> > > >> currently
>> > > >> >>> > > living
>> > > >> >>> > > >> and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> I've
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> managed to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> get in touch with the exile opposition,
>> > > which
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > enthusiastic
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> about
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > any
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> attempt. That, too, would be a secret
>> op
>> > run
>> > > >> out
>> > > >> >>> of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Project
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > PM
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> until
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> such
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> time as our cover is blown, at which
>> point
>> > > >> >>> Anonymous
>> > > >> >>> > > will
>> > > >> >>> > > >> be
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> thrown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > at
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> them.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> I expect those operations to begin in
>> two
>> > > >> weeks.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:06 PM, MICHAEL
>> > > RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Can u let me know what he says?
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---- Original Message ----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > From: Barrett Brown <
>> > barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > At: 2/4/2011 15:03
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Just heard back from Doron; Jay
>> Mafield
>> > > will
>> > > >> be
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > attorney.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Am
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> supposed
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > talk to Doron in a bit.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM,
>> MICHAEL
>> > > >> RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Working on the attorneys. If it
>> > doesn't
>> > > go
>> > > >> >>> today
>> > > >> >>> > it
>> > > >> >>> > > >> will
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > go
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> on
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> monday.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > But
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > let me know if other reporters call
>> > and
>> > > >> I'll
>> > > >> >>> try
>> > > >> >>> > > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > push
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> it.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---- Original Message ----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > From: Barrett Brown <
>> > > barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > At: 2/4/2011 13:59
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Did you manage to get a hold of
>> > > everyone?
>> > > >> >>> Haven't
>> > > >> >>> > > had
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > any
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> other
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> interview
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > requests since we spoke so you're
>> > good.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM,
>> > MICHAEL
>> > > >> >>> RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > will do. thanks you.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/
>> > > NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > At:  2/03 16:57:02
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Here, just call him -
>> 917-544-5471.
>> > > His
>> > > >> >>> other
>> > > >> >>> > > >> number,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> possibly
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> cell, is
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 845-482-3119. Try first one
>> first, I
>> > > >> don't
>> > > >> >>> know
>> > > >> >>> > > if
>> > > >> >>> > > >> he
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> wants me
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> giving
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > out
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > second one but I'm sure he won't
>> > mind
>> > > >> since
>> > > >> >>> I'm
>> > > >> >>> > > >> going
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> get
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > him
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> paid
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > via
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > legal defense fund (off the
>> record
>> > for
>> > > >> >>> now).
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM,
>> > > MICHAEL
>> > > >> >>> RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM: <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Hey, barrett. Will you do me a
>> > favor
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> >>> > check
>> > > >> >>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> earthlink
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> address
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > for
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Stanley. I tried it and it came
>> > back
>> > > >> >>> 'user
>> > > >> >>> > > >> unknown.'
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Also trying heidi.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > thx
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg
>> News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> >>> barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > At:  2/03 13:50:29
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > No problem, will do.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:50
>> PM,
>> > > >> MICHAEL
>> > > >> >>> > RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Thanks, I appreciate it. If
>> you
>> > > give
>> > > >> >>> this
>> > > >> >>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > anyone
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> else,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> could you
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > just
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > give me a heads up. That will
>> > give
>> > > >> me
>> > > >> >>> an
>> > > >> >>> > idea
>> > > >> >>> > > >> that
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > should
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> move as
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > quickly
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > as possible. My preference is
>> to
>> > > >> spend
>> > > >> >>> a
>> > > >> >>> > > little
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > more
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> time
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> talk
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > lawyers about this whole
>> thing.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg
>> News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> >>> barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > At:  2/03 13:47:54
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > You're the first today.
>> Anyway
>> > > I'll
>> > > >> >>> make
>> > > >> >>> > sure
>> > > >> >>> > > >> you
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > have
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > head
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > start.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:44
>> PM,
>> > > >> >>> MICHAEL
>> > > >> >>> > > RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > thanks, barrett. that's all
>> a
>> > > big
>> > > >> >>> help.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Can you tell me whether
>> you've
>> > > >> talked
>> > > >> >>> to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> other
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> reporters
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> about
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > this.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > have
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to run out to an interview
>> and
>> > > I'm
>> > > >> >>> just
>> > > >> >>> > > >> trying
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> figure
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > out
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> if I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > have
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > little time to talk Stanley
>> or
>> > > >> Heidi.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Again, much appreciated.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg
>> > News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message
>> -----
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>> > > >> >>> > barriticus@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY
>> (BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> NEWSROOM:)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > At:  2/03 13:33:26
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael-
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Good to meet you. Here's
>> the
>> > > info
>> > > >> I
>> > > >> >>> have.
>> > > >> >>> > > Let
>> > > >> >>> > > >> me
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> know if
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> forgot
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > anything.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Heidi Boghosian" <
>> > > >> director@nlg.org
>> > > >> >>> >,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> (NAtional
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Lawyers
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Guild
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > director
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > whom I'm working to choose
>> > > >> lawyers)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Stanley Cohen
>> > > >> >>> stanleycohen@earthlink.net-
>> > > >> >>> > > >> guy
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > who
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> guys
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > on
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Fox
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > defends
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Hamas, lol
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jan/27/anonymous-internet
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > -
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > my op-ed from other day,
>> with
>> > > >> links
>> > > >> >>> to
>> > > >> >>> > info
>> > > >> >>> > > >> on
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > OpTunisia,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> etc.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > As I mentioned, there are
>> > three
>> > > >> >>> people
>> > > >> >>> > I'm
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > assisting
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> in
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> this.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Trivette" is a channel
>> > operator
>> > > >> of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> anonops.ru,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> where a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> large
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > faction
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Anonymous movement does its
>> > > work.
>> > > >> >>> He's a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > California
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> male
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> whose
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > documents
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > have (partially, it seems).
>> > Here
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> entirety
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> what
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> have;
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > if
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > other
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > info is needed from him,
>> let
>> > me
>> > > >> know
>> > > >> >>> and
>> > > >> >>> > > I'll
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > get
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > it
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > ASAP.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> The
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > relevant
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > grand jury starts on Feb
>> 10.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Subpoena
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4348/sub2sw.jpg
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Attachment to federal grand
>> > jury
>> > > >> >>> > subpoena:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/1708/subz.jpg
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Owen" controls the
>> > > >> anonops.ruserver.
>> > > >> >>> > He
>> > > >> >>> > > >> was
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> raided by
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> FBI
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > but
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > has
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > not
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > received any subpoena. He
>> > > doesn't
>> > > >> >>> seem
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > interested
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > in
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> any
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> legal
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > advice
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > until
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > such point as he is
>> required
>> > to
>> > > >> get
>> > > >> >>> off
>> > > >> >>> > his
>> > > >> >>> > > >> ass
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > by
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Feds.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Rabbit"/"No" is a
>> 19-year-old
>> > > >> Nevada
>> > > >> >>> > > female.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Her
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> family
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> home was
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > raided
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > she was questioned at that
>> > > point.
>> > > >> She
>> > > >> >>> > > >> actually
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> called
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > right
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> after
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > I
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > got
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > off
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with you and told me the
>> > > >> following:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Equipment seized:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two broken laptops
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two jump drives
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > father's laptop
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > mac book
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > samsung phone
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > iphone
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > router
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > The search warrant was
>> shown
>> > to
>> > > >> her
>> > > >> >>> only
>> > > >> >>> > > >> after
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > she
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> had
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> requested
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > see
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > it
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > several times and was
>> > questioned
>> > > >> >>> about
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > MasterCard
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> etc
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > (it's
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > looking
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > like
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > MIAA thing may just be
>> > > peripheral
>> > > >> or
>> > > >> >>> even
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > unrelated,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> as
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > I'm
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> just
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > now
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > able
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > determine). It's headlined
>> > > United
>> > > >> >>> States
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > District
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Court
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Nevada.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > According
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to one section, it was
>> > supposed
>> > > to
>> > > >> be
>> > > >> >>> > > carried
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > out
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > by
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Feb
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > 9
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > -
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> one
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > day
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > before
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the California grand jury
>> goes
>> > > >> down.
>> > > >> >>> > She'll
>> > > >> >>> > > >> be
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > able
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > scan
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> it
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > get
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > it
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you or whoever ends up
>> > assisting
>> > > >> by
>> > > >> >>> > > Thursday
>> > > >> >>> > > >> but
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> it's in
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > reference
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > her
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > having allegedly accessed a
>> > > secure
>> > > >> >>> > computer
>> > > >> >>> > > >> to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> obtain
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > information,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 18
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > U.S.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > c
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 1030a2c.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at
>> 11:57
>> > AM,
>> > > >> >>> Barrett
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Brown <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > barriticus@gmail.com
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Michael-
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Sure, give me a call at
>> > > >> >>> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> whenever.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at
>> 11:52
>> > > AM,
>> > > >> >>> > MICHAEL
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > RILEY,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > BLOOMBERG/
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > NEWSROOM:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > <
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Hey, Barrett.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> I'm working on a story
>> > about
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> DoJ's
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > efforts
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> prosecute
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > individuals
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> associated with
>> Anonymous
>> > and
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> >>> DDoS
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > attacks
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > against
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> PayPal
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > and
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > others.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> The NYT mentioned that
>> > you're
>> > > >> >>> helping
>> > > >> >>> > to
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > organize
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > legal
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > assistance
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > for
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> some of those arrested
>> and
>> > > >> >>> released
>> > > >> >>> > > >> recently.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Do
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> you
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > have
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > couple
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> minutes to talk. I'm
>> > > interested
>> > > >> in
>> > > >> >>> > your
>> > > >> >>> > > >> sense
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> what
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> DoJ's
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > strategy
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > is
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> here. Is this about
>> making
>> > > some
>> > > >> >>> > examples
>> > > >> >>> > > >> from
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> few
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> people
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > associated
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Anonymous. Are they
>> trying
>> > to
>> > > >> go
>> > > >> >>> after
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > leaders
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > in
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> hopes of
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > beheading
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> group (which seems
>> > unlikely,
>> > > >> give
>> > > >> >>> the
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > nature).
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> And I'm also just
>> > interested
>> > > in
>> > > >> >>> what
>> > > >> >>> > > >> exactly
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> people
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > are
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> being
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > charged
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> with. From a legal
>> > > perspective,
>> > > >> >>> this
>> > > >> >>> > is
>> > > >> >>> > > a
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > tricky
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> move
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > on
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> their
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > part.
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Cheers,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Michael Riley
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Washington
>> bureau/Bloomberg
>> > > >> News
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (202) 624 1982
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> --
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > >> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >>
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > --
>> > > >> >>> > > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> > > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> > >
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > --
>> > > >> >>> > Regards,
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> --
>> > > >> >>> Regards,
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >>> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> --
>> > > >> >> Regards,
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> >> 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > --
>> > > >> > Regards,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Barrett Brown
>> > > >> > 512-560-2302
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Regards,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Barrett Brown
>> > > >> 512-560-2302
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Barrett Brown
>> > > > 512-560-2302
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Barrett Brown
>> > > 512-560-2302
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Barrett Brown
>> > 512-560-2302
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Barrett Brown
>> 512-560-2302
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302