They started their own journal to avoid having to undergo peer review from scientists not already committed to their ideas, but they stopped publishing it a couple years ago. They're not doing any significant research.

Intelligent design holds that certain biological features are so fundamentally complex that they could not have arisen via natural selection, and must instead be the result of intervention by some higher intelligence. They also claim that they've developed a scientifically rigorous method by which they can identify such designed features. For example, advocates claim that the blood clotting system in humans would serve no function whatsoever if even one of its components were to be missing, and thus that it couldn't have arisen from simpler forms via natural selection. And so they refer to a system like that as "irreducibly complex," and claim that this refutes the theory of evolution. The problem for intelligent design is that, despite the claims made by intelligent design, the same blood clotting system that exists in humans does indeed