Re: hey dude

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Andrew Blake <cooldudemcrad@gmail.com> wrote:

Of course. Good to know about Jay, at least. Claims are just that. If anything, he has a way with words. Thanks again, man. Nice talk on air the other day. Keep me posted on the book.

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

Well, Liederman is fine. But you can probably assess X's recent claims
for yourself.

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Andrew Blake <cooldudemcrad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Much appreciated, man. Still planning on having a talk with them on air,
> maybe even tomorrow. If they chose to represent themselves however they
> chose to represent themselves, then that is all in their doing. Something
> seems fishy, but when does it not? Thanks for your honesty. If you feel like
> you need to tell me anything else, don't hold back.
>
> -A
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Let's just say you're right to be cautious.
>>
>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Andrew Blake <cooldudemcrad@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Quick question, if you don't mind
>> >
>> > Chris Doyon and his lawyer, Jay Lieberman, may be interested in speaking
>> > with us at RT. Do you know either on a personal level? Judging by
>> > statements
>> > I've read from both, I'm interested in having them, but also I am a bit
>> > cautious. Any advice?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Barrett Brown
>> 940-735-9748
>
>

--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
940-735-9748