Subject: Re: possible "witness" I may be accused of trying to "intimidate" |
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
Date: 3/13/12, 20:38 |
To: Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com> |
I have some half baked thoughts that we should kick around to see if they can be fully developed. I'll try to call you today. If not I'll call tomorrow.Jay LeidermanLeiderman Devine LLP5740 Ralston St #300Ventura, California 93003Sent from my iPhoneBased on the Twitter exchange I just had with Emick, it's looking very much as if she has been making false claims to the FBI, up to and including the allegation that I somehow tried to hack her phone.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com> wrote:I understand that after their launch backtrace stated that they were working with the Feds, but who the fuck would believe them? She lies about EVERYTHING!!! You have to know she's a witness.Jay LeidermanLeiderman Devine LLP5740 Ralston St #300Ventura, California 93003Sent from my iPhoneThere is a strong possibility; Emick herself, under her FakeGreggHoush persona (which she did not admit to being until showing up at Defcon conference late last year), has repeatedly told me that I would be arrested for intimidating a "witness" - that "witness" being Emick herself.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com> wrote:You think this shit is over Fake Housh? That would be absurd.I'll look at the link later. Omw to Santa Cruz to clean up some of the X mess.Jay LeidermanLeiderman Devine LLP5740 Ralston St #300Ventura, California 93003Sent from my iPhoneJay-Having had more time to think, I'm starting to seriously consider the possibility that the FBI raid was prompted in part by this woman, Jennifer Emick - in which case I'd like to know what my options might be in terms of getting this taken care of. See this: http://pastebin.com/yPvN5TFL--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
940-735-9748
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
940-735-9748
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
940-735-9748