Subject: Re: possible "witness" I may be accused of trying to "intimidate" |
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
Date: 3/13/12, 20:22 |
To: Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com> |
I understand that after their launch backtrace stated that they were working with the Feds, but who the fuck would believe them? She lies about EVERYTHING!!! You have to know she's a witness.Jay LeidermanLeiderman Devine LLP5740 Ralston St #300Ventura, California 93003Sent from my iPhoneThere is a strong possibility; Emick herself, under her FakeGreggHoush persona (which she did not admit to being until showing up at Defcon conference late last year), has repeatedly told me that I would be arrested for intimidating a "witness" - that "witness" being Emick herself.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com> wrote:You think this shit is over Fake Housh? That would be absurd.I'll look at the link later. Omw to Santa Cruz to clean up some of the X mess.Jay LeidermanLeiderman Devine LLP5740 Ralston St #300Ventura, California 93003Sent from my iPhoneJay-Having had more time to think, I'm starting to seriously consider the possibility that the FBI raid was prompted in part by this woman, Jennifer Emick - in which case I'd like to know what my options might be in terms of getting this taken care of. See this: http://pastebin.com/yPvN5TFL--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
940-735-9748
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
940-735-9748