Subject: Re: possible "witness" I may be accused of trying to "intimidate"
From: Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com>
Date: 3/13/12, 19:20
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>

I understand that after their launch backtrace stated that they were working with the Feds, but who the fuck would believe them?  She lies about EVERYTHING!!!  You have to know she's a witness. 

Jay Leiderman
Leiderman Devine LLP
5740 Ralston St #300
Ventura, California 93003
805-654-0200
jay@leidermandevine.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 13, 2012, at 16:18, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

There is a strong possibility; Emick herself, under her FakeGreggHoush persona (which she did not admit to being until showing up at Defcon conference late last year), has repeatedly told me that I would be arrested for intimidating a "witness" - that "witness" being Emick herself.

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jay Leiderman <jay@leidermandevine.com> wrote:
You think this shit is over Fake Housh?  That would be absurd. 

I'll look at the link later. Omw to Santa Cruz to clean up some of the X mess. 

Jay Leiderman
Leiderman Devine LLP
5740 Ralston St #300
Ventura, California 93003

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 13, 2012, at 16:05, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

Jay-

Having had more time to think, I'm starting to seriously consider the possibility that the FBI raid was prompted in part by this woman, Jennifer Emick - in which case I'd like to know what my options might be in terms of getting this taken care of. See this:  http://pastebin.com/yPvN5TFL 

--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
940-735-9748



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
940-735-9748