Re: anonymous
Subject: Re: anonymous
From: Nicky Hager <nicky@paradise.net.nz>
Date: 2/19/12, 22:16
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>

Sounds good. I'll put a note in my diary and make contact.

On 20/02/2012, at 4:06 PM, Barrett Brown wrote:

Let's try to catch up in a couple months, via skype or some such.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Nicky Hager <nicky@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
Hi Barrett,

Thanks. It sounds likely it is dull material. So don't waste time on this: I hadn't thought about how much you have going on.

Good luck with everything. You're doing great things, but unfortunately when you do big things there are lots of pressures that can create wackiness and other sorts of trouble.

Nicky

On 17/02/2012, at 5:00 PM, Barrett Brown wrote:

I'm hearing that there's really nothing in there of interest; mostly forwarded stuff from Parliament, general notices. I'll see what can be done, though.

Have someone from Privacy International who just joined us, actually. Unfortunately, I've had little time to reference that release due to the book, other ongoing "explorations," etc. Things are getting wacky over here in the U.S., and especially in our sub-culture.

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nicky Hager <nicky@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
Hi Barrett,

Nicky Hager here. There was an article in our newspapers in New Zealand today about Anonymous "hacking" into the foreign minister's e-mail account (see below).

If you have any way to communicate with those folks, I'd be grateful to see any e-mails that they copied.

I am hoping the the big release of security company conference presentations by Privacy International in December 2011 has given you useful clues for your e-mail analysis.

all the best,

Nicky





Activists hacked McCully's emails

VERNON SMALL AND DANYA LEVY
Last updated 10:01 15/02/2012

Labour says revelations Foreign Affairs Minister McCully's email account was hacked into is a wake-up call and raises serious questions about what was sent to the private address.

The Telecom Xtra account was broken into by international hackers' collective Anonymous, potentially revealing sensitive Cabinet information and cable traffic from foreign posts.

McCully had asked that official emails be forwarded to that account while he was overseas in April last year.

Prime Minister John Key said he was aware of the breach and warned other ministers to be more careful, particularly about passwords.

Labour's information technology spokeswoman Clare Curran said she was "bemused" to learn the minister was having emails forwarded to a private accounts.

"There are questions to be answered."

If it was easier for the minister to access a private account when he was overseas, that was an issue that needed to be addressed by Parliament's information technology department.

But it was concerning if there was another reason, she said.

"What sort of correspondence would be going on between a minister and officials through a private account that wasn't subject to the Official Information Act?"

From time to time the Parliamentary email system was unable to be accessed, Curran said.

"(But) given he holds a ministerial position, is it sensible to be using another email account which is so obviously that you're a minister?"

Labour's foreign affairs spokesman - and former foreign affairs minister - Phil Goff said it was unusual to have material sent to a private email address.

It was important foreign affairs briefings be kept confidential.

"If you are in the midst of a visit in a foreign country and you are wanting full and frank advice from your ministry about the nature of events in that country, to have that leaked out could be diplomatically disastrous.

"It could totally undermine the nature of the visit you were having to that country."

The hacking was a "wake-up call" that email correspondence sent to private addresses was not confidential, Goff said.

"Anything an official nature should be going through protected channels."

The Dominion Post has been told the breach was investigated by the Government's security agencies, including the Government Communications and Security Bureau, which were continuing to monitor traffic for any leaked information.

Key could not confirm the bureau was involved but said it was "a reasonable assumption".

He was not aware of what information was accessed, but said "if it was really sensitive it would be out by now".

McCully said the breach took place while he was overseas and the account was closed down. "We discovered it because people started sending out emails from my account."

They had been about "a whole range of things" but mostly making fun at McCully's expense.

"I don't want to be more specific – I don't want to give people ideas."

McCully said there was no access to foreign cables in email form at that time and that Cabinet papers were also delivered in hard copy.

He would go back and check, but his memory was that the emails did not include Cabinet papers and cable traffic or anything that gave cause for concern.

It was just one of several accounts he operated.

"Ninety-five per cent of the stuff that comes through on that account when I am travelling is media stories ... then there's a bit of office administration stuff."

Officials in his office were careful and Foreign Affairs would not normally use that address to forward things to him.

McCully said he had not had an easily hacked password. "Any breach of security is serious. Mr Key made clear his expectations.

"My office and I are [now] more careful about these things."

It is understood questions have been raised about why officials agreed to forward the emails because it put them outside the security blanket around the Government's email system.

But Key's spokesman said there were no protocols that prevented ministers from having emails forwarded to private accounts.

Mark Watts, Telecom's acting head of corporate communications, declined to comment on the breach, saying the company never commented on matters of individual security.

"Telecom takes the security and privacy of our customers' information very seriously and has appropriate checks and systems in place to support this.

"These checks and systems are regularly reviewed," he said.

It is understood the breach came at about the time Anonymous threatened to attack the Parliament website in protest at the copyright law.

There was some discussion inside the Anonymous network about the email breach at the time, but no emails have so far been made public.

Last May Parliament's website was shut down for a morning after a threat by the group.

A member of the group also bragged about hacking a minister's website, but did not mention the email breach.

In recent weeks, the group has launched attacks on a range of sites, including the CIA, the United States Justice Department and the US Copyright Office.

This month Anonymous hackers intercepted and published a conference call between the FBI and Scotland Yard talking about how to deal with hackers.




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302