Re: quick opsony question
Subject: Re: quick opsony question
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 1/19/12, 18:35
To: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <michaelriley@bloomberg.net>

Yep, DoJ and RIAA and whitehouse.gov , prompted by MegaUpload as well as SOPA in general. New op, OpDonkeyPunch, will be described in WashPo in a few minutes.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:27 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
Hey there. So, did Anonymous really knock the website for DoJ offline? Can you give me a quick confirmation and rationale (megaupload, i'm guessing)?

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)
Twitter: @rileybloomberg

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At:  1/18 13:19:03

http://pastehtml.com/view/bjcixlhr1.html

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:16 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:

> Hey, is it accurate to say that opsony includes 1) plans to hack sony.comand let visitors download free copies of copyrighted videos and songs and
> 2) dox company executives?
>
> And is all of this supposed to begin next monday?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> To: barriticus@gmail.com
> At:  1/13 19:13:27
>
> Okay. Let me know what you hear.
>
> Cheers,
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Riley
> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> (202) 624 1982
> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> Twitter: @rileybloomberg
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> At:  1/13 18:53:43
>
> I haven't heard anything about this, but will ask around. I'd be surprised
> if it were actually the case.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:12 AM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > Hey Barrett.
> >
> > Off the record, is anonymous sitting on an email cache from Hunton &
> > Williams. I have a source involved in the forensics that said Anons
> rifled
> > the email server and got the archive. He said the firm is afraid you guys
> > are sitting on it and are going to post it at some point of your
> choosing.
> >
> > It all sounds plausible except for the 'sitting on it' part. That's not
> > usually how it's gone. If they've got the emails (which have GOT TO be
> > fascinating) why sit on them? As a result, I'm a bit skeptical. The Anons
> > could be using it for leverage -- 'if H&W hires anybody to go after the
> > Anon's the cache gets posted' kind of thing.
> >
> > So what do you know? Have they got the emails?
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Michael Riley
> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > (202) 624 1982
> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > Twitter: @rileybloomberg
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > At: 12/23 19:22:15
> >
> > In case you're interested:
> >
> >
> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/23/1048405/-Boston-police-versus-Anonymous:-An-Update?via=blog_481394
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Barrett Brown
> > 512-560-2302
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302