Subject: Re: quick opsony question
From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
Date: 1/19/12, 18:27
To: barriticus@gmail.com

Hey there. So, did Anonymous really knock the website for DoJ offline? Can you give me a quick confirmation and rationale (megaupload, i'm guessing)? 

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)
Twitter: @rileybloomberg

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At:  1/18 13:19:03

http://pastehtml.com/view/bjcixlhr1.html

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:16 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:

Hey, is it accurate to say that opsony includes 1) plans to hack sony.comand let visitors download free copies of copyrighted videos and songs and
2) dox company executives?

And is all of this supposed to begin next monday?

----- Original Message -----
From: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
To: barriticus@gmail.com
At:  1/13 19:13:27

Okay. Let me know what you hear.

Cheers,

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)
Twitter: @rileybloomberg

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At:  1/13 18:53:43

I haven't heard anything about this, but will ask around. I'd be surprised
if it were actually the case.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:12 AM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:

Hey Barrett.

Off the record, is anonymous sitting on an email cache from Hunton &
Williams. I have a source involved in the forensics that said Anons
rifled
the email server and got the archive. He said the firm is afraid you guys
are sitting on it and are going to post it at some point of your
choosing.

It all sounds plausible except for the 'sitting on it' part. That's not
usually how it's gone. If they've got the emails (which have GOT TO be
fascinating) why sit on them? As a result, I'm a bit skeptical. The Anons
could be using it for leverage -- 'if H&W hires anybody to go after the
Anon's the cache gets posted' kind of thing.

So what do you know? Have they got the emails?

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)
Twitter: @rileybloomberg

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At: 12/23 19:22:15

In case you're interested:


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/23/1048405/-Boston-police-versus-Anonymous:-An-Update?via=blog_481394

--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302




-- Regards, Barrett Brown 512-560-2302