| Subject: A time for anarchy |
| From: Andreas Winsnes <andreaswinsnes@gmail.com> |
| Date: 1/18/12, 09:29 |
| To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
LAW is neutral toward all ideologies, and therefore it is not a problem from this perspective to present the best arguments in favour of each ideology, for example the worldview of Mao or Osama bin Laden. Here is an article where I defend anarchism, and explain what I mean by national anarchism:
And if you read the article about the white race, notice that I refute the main arguments used by racists.
One of the primary goals of the LAW project is to help thousands of children who are dying in developing countries. Are you really not willing to support this only because I, from the standpoint of neutrality, present arguments in favour of ideologies you strongly disagree with? Is your own ideology more important than helping children dying of starvation?