| Subject: RE: Eh? |
| From: Daniel Conaway <dconaway@WritersHouse.com> |
| Date: 9/7/11, 17:10 |
| To: 'Barrett Brown' <barriticus@gmail.com> |
And what about that Q on p. 3,
“Does this mean they sometimes LEAD counterattacks against Anonymous?”
Dan Conaway
Literary Agent
Writers House
(212) 696-3825
From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:32 PM
To: Daniel Conaway
Subject: Re: Eh?
Page 21 query: Yes, change "figures" to "employees".
Page 23 query: Regarding putting info about what HBGary was planning against Wikileaks in "first intro on HBGary;" I'm not sure how to that without jumping ahead of the narrative. Perhaps I could add a sentence after this is first revealed emphasizing the extent
to which that further motivated Anon to continue fucking with them? Otherwise, give me a call if you like.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
In response to page 19 query, change sentence to this:
It was so flawed, in fact, that we decided to release it ourselves; and having also soon discovered through
other e-mails that Barr had been planning to present this “data” to the FBI the following Monday, we also put out a press release noting how much trouble the contractor could have caused for innocents
who might have ended up the target of a federal probe or even an armed raid as a result of Barr's failures.
More coming in a minute, had to eat.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Okay, gotcha.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Conaway <dconaway@writershouse.com> wrote:
Well, I’m already doing some add’l tinkering, so it’s probably best if I insert
the fixes on MY version—so if you want to just put them all as patches in a single email, w/ page #s, I can tuck them in, then send back the “final” file to everybody.
From:
Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:43 PM
To: Daniel Conaway
Subject: Re: Eh?
Ah, didn't notice those. You want me to just add in fixes all at once and then send back, but call you first if there's
any we need to go over by phone?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Daniel Conaway <dconaway@writershouse.com>
wrote:
OK, Barrett—
So I’m going through this now. Can you take a look at the handful of marginal
queries in this version and see if there are easy fixes for them? Then you can send me “patches,” which I’ll insert, or you can call me & dictate them to me, either way. That work?
From:
Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:13 PM
To: Daniel Conaway
Subject: Re: Eh?
Here you go. Take a look and if you need to make more queries, you can call at will.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Daniel Conaway <dconaway@writershouse.com>
wrote:
OK—and note that there were a few other queries I had too…
From:
Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:02 PM
To: Daniel Conaway
Subject: Re: Eh?
Damn, I had two of them. Give me a few minutes and I'll integrate the changes I just made into the other one. I've
got them all listed here so won't be a problem.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Conaway <dconaway@writershouse.com>
wrote:
Barrett, I think this must be the wrong file—the stuff we did over the phone
isn’t changed in this version.
From:
Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:55 PM
To: Daniel Conaway; Anonymous
Subject: Re: Eh?
Okay, here it is, with all of Gregg's edits actually implemented this time as well as the couple of line edits we
did over the phone yesterday.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
wrote:
Indeed.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Conaway <dconaway@writershouse.com>
wrote:
Don’t rush, OK? Better that it be clean, truly. And you’ll be sure to take
out that business about G’s neighbor, right?
From:
Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:31 PM
To: Daniel Conaway
Subject: Re: Eh?
Give me an hour and I'll have it in, something came up suddenly.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Conaway <dconaway@writershouse.com>
wrote:
Hey, Barrett—
I never got the revised proposal—can you send it?
Thanks,
Dan
Dan Conaway
Literary Agent
Writers House
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302