Nicky-

Thanks for getting back to me and for the input.

Yes, there's definitely more to be found within the e-mails, which we have compiled into Gmail accounts (one for Aaron Barr, another for Greg Hoglund, etc) largely because the Gmail search function is more robust than that utilized by the original Anonleaks site, which only allows users to effectively search with a single term at once. Other than myself, I have several capable people looking into them gradually, if not methodically. The problem with the general subject matter, as with Romas/COIN, is that very little is spelled out in such a way as to be clear from one or two e-mails; to get even a shadowy sense of anything, we have to work off of clues here and there. And of course I've probably read over things that are significant but which I'm not equipped to identify as such. As such, our policy is to continually add to the wiki in such a way as to better describe the nature of individual firms and capabilities, in hopes that it will be valuable to journalists who undertake to look into one or another aspect of this. Tom Burghardt, for instance, just released a sort of follow-up piece to the Romas/COIN report that provides new (to us) information on Archimedes Global, one of the firms involved in the recompete attempt, and we'll now be able to expand our wiki with that info.

 In short, it's very likely that someone such as yourself would hit upon something "actionable" if you were to spend a bit of time searching around.

Let me know if you'd like the login info for the 70,000 HBGary e-mails divided by employee. We also have 1,000 taken from the CEO of Unveillance, a smaller firm with connections to a few others that we've been looking into.

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Nicky Hager <nicky@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

PS I meant to say, do you think there is more to be mined out of the e-mail resource, or have you done it pretty throughly?

--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302