Re: Story on Bradley Manning

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Sapienza <jeremy.sapienza@gmail.com> wrote:

How disappointing. What can we do with this?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Haurek, Alex <Alex.Haurek@mail.house.gov>
Date: Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Story on Bradley Manning
To: Jeremy Sapienza <jeremy.sapienza@gmail.com>

It means, you aren't to use my name... you may say a spokesman or our
office, if you must mention us at all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Sapienza [mailto:jeremy.sapienza@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:50 PM
To: Haurek, Alex
Subject: Re: Story on Bradley Manning

Ok, I wasn't sure what you meant by the "background" part.

Is there a reason why your office has no comment? Do you personally at
least recognize it's important given the two fire-breathers on the
issue a stone's throw from the congresswoman's district?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Haurek, Alex
<Alex.Haurek@mail.house.gov> wrote:
> No
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Sapienza [mailto:jeremy.sapienza@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:48 PM
> To: Haurek, Alex
> Subject: Re: Story on Bradley Manning
>
> Did you mean to attach something?
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Haurek, Alex
> <Alex.Haurek@mail.house.gov> wrote:
>> Jeremy -
>>
>>
>>
>> This is background, but we won't be commenting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Haurek
>>
>> Communications Director
>>
>> Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez (D-NY)
>>
>> 202-225-2361
>>
>> Alex.haurek@mail.house.gov
>>
>>
>