Subject: the use of the douchebag word for prime effect |
From: mary eng <maryeng1@yahoo.com> |
Date: 5/18/11, 18:53 |
i am a biological woman with a high IQ. dig?
barret i am so thankful you have the confidence of discussing such content.
the word douchebag creates a very visual image, which references an obsession
with female genitalia, and the sense that they are unclean. i know by douchebag
you mean lame dude. but you might hone in on some natural eloquence or content.
there is no need to be so nasty. it detracts from your ideas. and i know you
are not intentionally being sexist. it just sounds less than educated.
i think a more eloquent approach would appeal. if used over and over it ceases
to have . . .
i have the story on sweden. if you want it. i went there and interviewed and
got a good sense of the rove angle. its nasty. also re kevin zeese and
operation want.
i think anon and PM have so much and charisma, but losing the nasty language
will help not alienate women and homosexuals
if this point is lost on you i am not questioning free speech but rather, a
marketing strategy
and or deeper subconscious motives/fears/embarrassments
maryeng1 skype, youtube, bambuser
maryeng1@gmail.com
http://braingarbagedystopie.blogspot.com/