Re: wsj
Subject: Re: wsj
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 5/4/11, 18:55
To: "Bryan-Low, Cassell" <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com>

For Immediate Distribution
Press Release
May 4, 2011
Anonymous Enterprises LLC (Bermuda)


Last month, an unknown party managed to break into Sony's servers and acquired millions of customer records including credit card numbers. Insomuch as that this incident occurred in the midst of Anonymous' OpSony, by which participants engaged in several of our standard information war procedures against the corporation and its executives, Sony and other parties have come to blame Anonymous for the heist. Today, in a letter directed to members of Congress involved in an inquiry into the situation, Sony claimed to have discovered a file on its servers, presumably left by the thieves in question, entitled "Anonymous" and containing a fragment of our slogan, "We are Legion." In response, we would like to raise the following points:

1. Anonymous has never been known to have engaged in credit card theft.

2. Many of our corporate and governmental adversaries, on the other hand, have been known to have lied to the public about Anonymous and about their own activities. HBGary, for instance, was caught lying a number of times to the press, to the public, and to Anonymous itself (in this phone call, for instance, ( http://tinyurl.com/68pbdj8) CEO Aaron Barr makes a number of untrue statements regarding the intent of his "research," claiming for instance that he never tried to sell the information to the FBI when e-mails acquired soon showed that he had been set to do just that; executive Karen Burke was also caught lying to Bloomberg about having not seen an incriminating e-mail that she had in fact replied to just a few days before). The U.S. Chamber of Commerce lied about not having seen the criminal proposal created by them for Team Themis; Palantir lied about not having any idea what their employees were up to; Berico publicly denounced a plan that they had actively engaged in creating; etc. There is no corporation in existence will choose the truth when lies are more convenient.

3. To the contrary, Anonymous is an ironically transparent movement that allows reporters in to our operating channels to observe us at work and which has been extraordinarily candid with the press when commenting on our own activities, which is why reporters prefer to talk to us for truthful accounts of the situation rather than go to our degenerate enemies to be lied to.

4. Whoever broke into Sony's servers to steal the credit card info and left a document blaming Anonymous clearly wanted Anonymous to be blamed for the most significant digital theft in history. No one who is actually associated with our movement would do something that would prompt a massive law enforcement response. On the other hand, a group of standard online thieves would have every reason to frame Anonymous in order to put law enforcement off the track. The framing of others for crimes has been a common practice throughout history.

5. It should be remembered that several federal contractors such as HBGary and Palantir have been caught planning a variety of unethical and potentially criminal conspiracies by which to discredit the enemies of their clients. This is not a theory - this is a fact that has been reported at great length by dozens of journalists with major publications. Insomuch as that our enemies have either engaged in or planned to engage in false flag efforts, it should not be surprising that many of the journalists who have covered us, who know who we are and what motivates us - and who have alternatively seen the monstrous behavior of those large and "respectable" firms that are all too happy to throw aside common decency at the behest of such clients as Bank of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce - also have their suspicions that some capable party performed this operation as a means by which to do great damage to Anonymous in the public eye. Those who consider such a prospect to be somehow unlikely are advised to read about what was proposed by Team Themis in their efforts to destroy Wikileaks, and should otherwise take a few minutes to learn about COINTELPRO and other admitted practices by the U.S. intelligence community. The fact is that Anonymous has brought a great deal of discomfort to powerful entities such as Booz Allen Hamilton, Palantir, and much of the federal government; the Justice Department in particular is likely unhappy that our efforts revealed that it was they themselves who recommended the now-discredited "law firm" Hunton & Williams to Bank of America in order that the latter might better be able to fight back against Wikileaks. All of this is now public record, and anyone who finds it laughable that those or other entities may have again engaged in tactics that they are known to have engaged in in the past is not qualified to comment on the situation.

Anonymous will continue its work in support of transparency and individual liberty; our adversaries will continue their work in support of secrecy and control. The FBI will continue to investigate us for crimes of civil disobediance while continuing to ignore the crimes planned by major corporations with which they are in league.

We do not forget, even if others fail to remember.
We not forgive, even if others forgive our enemies for those things for which we are attacked.
We are legion, and will remain so no matter how many of our participants are raided by armed agents of a broken system.
We are Anonymous.


On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Bryan-Low, Cassell <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com> wrote:
Thanks for your input. And, would be great if you could send the info of the FBI agent who you spoke to.


Thanks
Cassell

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

 
From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 08:47 PM

To: Bryan-Low, Cassell
Subject: Re: wsj
 
I'm awake now so you can try to call me back if you'd like. Here's my statement:

The hackers could have very well left a file on their servers called "Congress" and carrying the slogan "We investigate steroid use by baseball players in the midst of two wars."

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Bryan-Low, Cassell <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com> wrote:
Hi Barrett,
 
Sorry I didn't get the chance to call you back yesterday but just left you a message. (For some strange reason I am able to call you from my blackberry but not from my work landline.) Anyway, I had wanted to ask you about a couple of things but then there's been a development today that I wanted to run past you on deadline, specifically the Sony Corp letter to Congress which says that the data-breach intruders had left a file on their servers called "Anonymous" and carrying the slogan "we are legion." It does acknowledge it could be the work of a clever thief, however. Is there any response on behalf of Anonymous that you would want to give on that?
 
I also had a couple of quick follow up questions. Let me know when you're free to talk and I'll call you back. Or, feel free to call me on 011 44 207 842 9211.
 
Best
Cassell


From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 May 2011 19:16

To: Bryan-Low, Cassell
Subject: Re: wsj

You can try me at 512-560-2302, although I recall you had trouble doing so last time. If you have Skype, I'm at barrett.brown33

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Bryan-Low, Cassell <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com> wrote:
Thanks for the update. Is there a number I can call you on for a quick couple of questions on this and various other fronts? Alternatively, I'm at 011 44 207 842911.
 
Regards
Cassell


From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 May 2011 06:51

To: Bryan-Low, Cassell
Subject: Re: wsj

Also, in case you're interested, OpIran re-launched on Sunday, we took down a number of government sites and have initiated a new campaign by which to provide encryption tools to dissidents while also encouraging individuals from around the world to join in on DDOS attacks against online assets of pro-regime groups like the Iranian Cyber Army. Info here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/02/972425/-Help-Anonymous-help-Iran,-now#comments

Basically, I want to make Anonymous more of a mainstream phenomenon and prompt far more people to engage in information warfare against dictatorships and all states that employ oppressive means against their own citizens.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I haven't been involved in the Sony affair other than hanging around in the OpSony IRC channel a bit every now and then; it's not one of my areas of interest. I have no evidence that anyone associated with Anonymous was responsible for this hack, and it certainly wasn't anyone from the team that did HBGary. Anonops put out a press release denying responsibility, as you may know. Having said that, it's very possible that the incident is nonetheless related to the overall campaign insomuch as that a well-publicized attack by Anon obviously prompts a great deal of attention by others. It's also possible that a group of criminal hackers took the opportunity to pull off this heist and leave Anonymous as prime suspect - a Bloomberg reporter just told me that Sony is talking about blaming us and will potentially go public with that accusation soon.

Meanwhile, we may be launching an attack on Gamma International in retaliation for their attempt to provide surveillance and IT intrusion capabilities to Mubarak regime; this was just decided a little while ago. Right now the fellow who would be launching that attack is having to use his bot army to fend off an attack against our Anonops IRC server, which is being hit from five IPs using 7GBs each - an unusually powerful attack. There are a number of suspects on this one, as there are plenty of entities that would like to see us disrupted right now in particular. 


http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201117/7115/Report-U-K-firm-offered-IT-intrusion-tools-to-Egyptian-government?page=1


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Bryan-Low, Cassell <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com> wrote:
Interesting, thanks for the heads up.
 
By the way, do you know anything about the Sony online gaming network hack and potential credit-card detail swipe?


From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 April 2011 22:54

To: Bryan-Low, Cassell
Subject: Re: wsj

Cassell-

We're going after this U.K firm, Gamma International, due to its actions in support of the Mubarak regime during the revolt, as well as due to its likely overall role in the methodology we refer to as Metal Gear.


On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Bryan-Low, Cassell <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com> wrote:
Thanks so much, and noted on the 'doxing' as it relates to the individual employees. How is that info on the employees gathered - by hacking into email? And, can you send me a link to where it is being posted on the Net?
 
And, is there a statement from you and/or Anonymous about the reason for the action against Sony and the employees?
 
Thanks too for the info on the other events, will check it out.
 
Cassell


From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2011 01:31

To: Bryan-Low, Cassell
Subject: Re: wsj

All of that is true except that the attacks on individual employees aren't DDOS attacks, but rather investigations into their activities followed by "doxing," which entails the posting of their information on the internet. I'm not particularly involved in OpSony so I haven't been following closely. Also, I'm in New York this month  as I'm speaking tomorrow at a rally organized by my group Project PM and several other entities, including prominent Anonymous participants like Gregg Housh and anti-war activist John Penley. Speakers will include the head of National Lawyers Guild and a former Army psyops officer. We're also holding meetings throughout the week pursuant to the building of a larger coalition by which to fight back against those who oppose information freedom efforts such as Wikileaks. Rolling Stone and several documentary crews will be following many of the proceedings.  More info:


I'll be making an announcement about the next step in Operation Metal Gear, which is what I've been most heavily involved in for the past month and which we launched via recorded phone calls to executives of Booz Allen Hamilton and former NSA director Mike McConnell. More info on Metal Gear:


http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201111/6939/Anonymous-Government-contractor-has-weaponized-social-media

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Bryan-Low, Cassell <Cassell.Bryan-Low@wsj.com> wrote:
Hi Barrett 
 
I wanted to check in with you regarding Sony. Is it true to say Anonymous has launched DDOS attacks against Sony in retaliation for the legal action Sony took against Hotz and Egorenkov under the name OpSony? And, if so, when did the attacks start and against which Web sites? 
 
And, has Anonymous also started launching DDOS attacks against individual Sony employees? if so, which individuals and what are the DDOS attacks against? And, when did those attacks start?
 
Thanks,
Cassell
 
 



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302