Subject: Chat with Clark Robinson
From: Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com>
To: barriticus@gmail.com

me: so
me: a reporter for The Guardian
me: asked to see Anon's inner circle
me: they created a fake room
me: let her in
me: and told her they'd carry on business as usual
me: 7:35:44] <Topiary> We really need D in here. We were supposed to have those maps up about 12 hours ago.
[17:35:47] <Avunit> They're probably working their asses of to patch everything q, but we still have those hidden shells.
[17:35:51] <Topiary> That man sleeps like a beast...
[17:36:06] <Avunit> Well he fucking exploits shit in his dreams too though.
[17:37:59] <Topiary> http://www.p2pnet.net/story/48658
[17:38:00] <Avunit> Anyone heard anything from RR.Rson lately?
[17:38:27] <Topiary> Avunit: Yes, he's switching his gear again. Doxers.

me: and they are not exactly doing that
Clark: i'm not understanding this
me: I know
me: it's gobbledegook
me: they're trolling the reporter
me: [17:41:43] <Topiary> Don: Confirm
[17:41:47] <Don> i dont have much time.
[17:41:52] <Don> will be back later tho.
[17:41:57] <Don> charlie will be back in 5
[17:42:02] <Don> did some hardening and shit
[17:42:14] <Topiary> That's good news, we were just talking about Charlie dun goofing hard over the past few days
[17:42:22] <Topiary> we really put too much into Gary
[17:42:30] <Topiary> a real success though.
[17:42:34] <Don> yeah, it basically had no ddos protection.
[17:42:51] <Avunit> We cant be backtraced anyway.

me: some of these are memes
me: there is no secret room
Clark: why are they picking on the guardian?
me: several reasons
me: they didn't like some articlees
me: and they don't seem to like this reporter
me: I'd feel bad about it were it not for the fact that editors were complaining about a comment I left at the last op-ed
me: they ask me to write comments, you know
me: and then they "raise eyebrows" over it
me: still, not my decision
me: so I'm just enjoying it
me: I don't know what articles the thought were inaccurate
me: to my dismay, I no longer have time to even follow what's being written about me
Clark: i dunno, seems kind of low-road to mess with well-intentioned inept folks who have no evil agenda
me: well, if that's the lowest the road gets
me: on our team
me: I'll be happy
Clark: yes, good point
me: same guys are also sending laptops to Egypt
Clark: the tech press is all loving the stuff you write
me: let them have their fun
me: I know
me: talked to WSJ today
me: questions are getting different
me: they admire us
me: Bloomberg
me: etc
me: business press
me: conservative types
me: oh, also
me: we've made a few more discoveries.
Clark: well, you can always just explain it ain't the TEKE house and you cant blackball the pledges
me: yeah
me: I mean, we've been great to the press
me: me especially
me: I used to be one of them
Clark: the NPR transcript seemed fair
me: meh
me: wish they'd picked better quotes
me: next Bloomberg piece will be better
Clark: the last bloomberg piece was good
Clark: per twitter, libya is blowing up, i havent had a chance to look anywhere else
me: Aaron Barr had stuxnet.
me: we have it now.
me: stuxnet is something that freaks people out
me: and it should
me: not even going to give you link
me: you don't want it
Clark: you are right, i dont
Clark: but that is frightening that someone like barr had it
me: we didn't mean to get it
me: you know who sent it to him?
me: to this douchebag?
me: CEO of McAffe
Clark: maybe you should tell hastings to expose them
me: think Hastings is unreachable right now
Clark: a pass-around copy of something that bad, seems like that needs exposing--that idiots are passing it around, and our govt busy chasing teenage hackers instead
me: oh, I just announced
Clark: on twitter?
Clark: ok, just appeared
me: first in #reporter
Clark: crown victorias in your driveway any minute?
me: on the anon IRC
me: don't have a driveway, lol
me: they better not
me: we are currently composing our stuxnet policy
me: it will be similar to my own Releasing Video of Lou Sessions Getting Involved in Soon-to-Collapse Oil Deal policy
me: http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/10/lobbyists-chamberleaks/
Clark: saw that earlier, must have been tweeted by somebody
Clark: one of the tech sites had a good followup story about this IRC session: http://pastebin.com/x69Akp5L