At: 2/07 23:50:31
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
http://crowdleaks.org/anonymous-retaliates-against-hbgary-espionage/
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Also, I recorded the call, as well as the one with Penny, and did so here
>> in Texas where I'm allowed to do so.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
>>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice.
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Michael Riley
>>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> (202) 624 1982
>>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> At: 2/07 20:05:55
>>>
>>> Download an IRC client like Icechat and come to
irc.anonops.ru #ophbgary
>>> or
>>> #reporters. Someone will help you.
>>>
>>> Also, I probably noted that Aaron was telling me last night that wasn't
>>> attempting to hurt us. Please see this draft of a Crowdleaks article,
>>> which
>>> includes an e-mail in which Aaron brags about various things.
>>>
https://uloadr.com/u/55.png
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
>>>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks for the tip.
>>> >
>>> > I haven't tried it myself but will tonight. How exactly do I find the
>>> > emails? I'd like to get in the queue and have a look what's in there...
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > Michael Riley
>>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > (202) 624 1982
>>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > At: 2/07 18:30:43
>>> >
>>> > I'd hurry on the e-mail, though, they're going through all of them on
>>> IRC
>>> > and reporters are in. Luckily there are lots of e-mails, lol.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
>>> >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > nice. thank you.
>>> > >
>>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > Michael Riley
>>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > At: 2/07 18:13:57
>>> > >
>>> > > Attached, a screenshot of that e-mail thread. Enjoy.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Dude, I have so many enemies at this point that I can't even
>>> remember
>>> > > their
>>> > > > names. Also, lol @ Karen.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:
>>> <
>>> > > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> terrific. thanks. funny story: i asked karen about the email and
>>> she
>>> > > said
>>> > > >> that she didn't know anything about it. that's before i knew it
>>> was
>>> > > >> addressed to her.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> it is going to be hard to deny knowledge when she read it in her
>>> inbox
>>> > > on
>>> > > >> saturday.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> remind me never to get on your bad side. lol.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> Michael Riley
>>> > > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> At: 2/07 17:57:07
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> <
greg@hbgary.com> Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM
>>> > > >> To: Karen Burke <
karen@hbgary.com>
>>> > > >> Cc: Aaron Barr <
aaron@hbgary.com>
>>> > > >> Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
>>> > > >> I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would be
>>> interesting
>>> > > >> to leave the soft impression that Aaron is the one thatgot them,
>>> and
>>> > > >> that without Aaron the Feds would have never been able to get out
>>> of
>>> > > >> their own way. So, position Aaron as a hero to the public. At this
>>> > > >> point they are going to get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some
>>> > > >> concerns on how that might affect commerical business (although
>>> I'm
>>> > > >> not clear on why yet)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>>> NEWSROOM: <
>>> > > >>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > I just have a couple of questions about the email. My editors
>>> want
>>> > to
>>> > > >> get
>>> > > >> > as much authentication as we can.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > what is that address of the account that it's from -- greg's
>>> > account,
>>> > > i
>>> > > >> > guess (i assume it's on corporate email but could be them using
>>> a
>>> > > public
>>> > > >> > email server, i suppose). and who was the email address to?
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > and is it formatted in the way you guys have it? in other words,
>>> can
>>> > > we
>>> > > >> see
>>> > > >> > the whole thing with the to, from, su, etc?
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > At: 2/07 17:34:57
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > Okay, but only because I like you. I gave OWen your e-mail,
>>> he'll be
>>> > > in
>>> > > >> > touch soon.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>>> NEWSROOM:
>>> > <
>>> > > >> >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > > Okay. I'll put that in the story. that's great stuff. can we
>>> have
>>> > > that
>>> > > >> > > exclusively?
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > At: 2/07 17:08:01
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > And that e-mail is timestamped Sat, feb 5, 9.02am. Still
>>> bugging
>>> > > Owen
>>> > > >> > for
>>> > > >> > > state.
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Barrett Brown <
>>> >
barriticus@gmail.com
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > wrote:
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > > Meanwhile, having gone through the e-mails that were
>>> acquired,
>>> > we
>>> > > >> have
>>> > > >> > > > discovered the following message from Greg at HBGary
>>> Federal:
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > "I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would be
>>> > > >> interesting
>>> > > >> > > > toleave the soft impression that Aaron is the one that got
>>> them,
>>> > > and
>>> > > >> > > > thatwithout Aaron the Feds would have never been able to get
>>> out
>>> > > of
>>> > > >> > > theirown
>>> > > >> > > > way.So, position Aaron as a hero to the public. But point
>>> they
>>> > are
>>> > > >> > going
>>> > > >> > > to
>>> > > >> > > > get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some concerns on how
>>> that
>>> > > might
>>> > > >> > > affect
>>> > > >> > > > commerical business although not clear on why yet"
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > Mail ID: mail 1297012949.M839500P25652Q2423
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Barrett Brown <
>>> > >
barriticus@gmail.com
>>> > > >> > > >wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >> "no they did not seize a server form me. just acouple of my
>>> > boxes
>>> > > >> and
>>> > > >> > > >> CD/DVDs
>>> > > >> > > >> [16:00] <owen> also my blakcberry"
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >> Still waiting for him to tell me what state.
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> <
>>> > > >> > > >>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> thx. i'm trying to run the story this evening (so it shows
>>> up
>>> > on
>>> > > >> the
>>> > > >> > > web
>>> > > >> > > >>> early tomorrow). Let me know as soon as possible what you
>>> > get...
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> At: 2/07 17:00:26
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> I've sent him a message asking, will let you know.
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> NEWSROOM: <
>>> > > >> > > >>>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > ok. if you could confirm if they took the server.
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > And I just need the a state for Owen. We can just use
>>> his
>>> > > cyber
>>> > > >> > > handle,
>>> > > >> > > >>> but
>>> > > >> > > >>> > i need to show where the FBI seized the stuff. Not a
>>> city.
>>> > > Just
>>> > > >> > > state.
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > At: 2/07 16:42:08
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > No, Owen isn't in NYC. That's one of the many things
>>> that
>>> > > Aaron
>>> > > >> got
>>> > > >> > > >>> wrong,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > including my supposed other handles. I've heard from one
>>> > > fellow
>>> > > >> who
>>> > > >> > > >>> plans
>>> > > >> > > >>> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > sue.
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > The feds took quite a bit of equipment from Owen but not
>>> all
>>> > > of
>>> > > >> it.
>>> > > >> > > >>> Pretty
>>> > > >> > > >>> > sure they took a server but want to confirm before I say
>>> yes
>>> > > or
>>> > > >> no.
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>>> BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > <
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > owen is in new york state, is that right?
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > And did the fbi actually take the server?
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > At: 2/07 15:27:56
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Basically, we got hbgary's e-mails along with hbgary
>>> > > >> federal's.
>>> > > >> > > Prez,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > penny, called me to make the distinction. I told her
>>> to
>>> > come
>>> > > >> into
>>> > > >> > > irc
>>> > > >> > > >>> to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > talk. She and greg whatshisname, who is a douche, were
>>> in
>>> > > for
>>> > > >> a
>>> > > >> > > >>> couple
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > hours. I don't think a consensus has been reached on
>>> our
>>> > end
>>> > > >> as
>>> > > >> > > >>> regards
>>> > > >> > > >>> > what
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > to do, but anyway I don't think the e-mails have yet
>>> been
>>> > > >> > > downloaded
>>> > > >> > > >>> by
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > anyone because file isn't being sufficiently seeded
>>> via
>>> > > >> torrent,
>>> > > >> > so
>>> > > >> > > >>> there
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > may still be time to come to a decision. I like penny
>>> but
>>> > > some
>>> > > >> > > others
>>> > > >> > > >>> > don't
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > trust her on this matter when she claims to be angry
>>> with
>>> > > >> aaron,
>>> > > >> > > etc.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Meanwhile greg has made some threatening statements to
>>> the
>>> > > >> press
>>> > > >> > > so,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > yeah,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > that wasn't particularly brilliant of him.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
>>> > > >> > > >>>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 15:21:01
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > I bet. Busy I mean.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Can you tell me what the negotiations are about? I can
>>> put
>>> > a
>>> > > >> > couple
>>> > > >> > > >>> of
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > graphs in the story...
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > At: 2/07 15:02:32
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Don't have it yet, will try. Been busy. Spoke to
>>> > principals
>>> > > of
>>> > > >> > > hbgary
>>> > > >> > > >>> > last
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > night, negotiations, etc.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
>>> > > >> > > >>>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 10:17:08
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Subject: rabbit/no search warrant
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Hey Barrett. Do you have a scanned copy of the search
>>> > > warrant
>>> > > >> the
>>> > > >> > > >>> feds
>>> > > >> > > >>> > gave
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > rabbit/no during the search?
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > At: 2/06 20:50:33
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/2/6/941730/-Anonymous-pwns-HBGary-Federal
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Barrett Brown <
>>> > > >> > >
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > Also, we've acquired the document that HBGary was to
>>> > sell
>>> > > to
>>> > > >> > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> FBI.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > I'm
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > mentioned a couple of times, including an occasion
>>> on
>>> > > which
>>> > > >> I
>>> > > >> > > asked
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > people
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > to attend a meeting on building dark nets.
>>> > > >> > >
http://hizost.com/d/zjb
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Barrett Brown <
>>> > > >> > > >>>
barriticus@gmail.com
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Also, Anon has taken down HBGary's website,
>>> acquired
>>> > > 60,000
>>> > > >> > > >>> e-mails,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> destroyed backup files, acquired Barr's Twitter (
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > >
https://twitter.com/#!/aaronbarr/status/34395565458456576
>>> > > >> ),
>>> > > >> > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> more.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Barr is currently in
irc.anonops.ru pleading with
>>> us.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Barrett Brown <
>>> > > >> > > >>>
barriticus@gmail.com
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Michael-
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> You may have seen yesterday's Financial Times
>>> piece
>>> > > which
>>> > > >> > > claimed
>>> > > >> > > >>> > that
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> the operational heads of Anonymous had been
>>> identified
>>> > > by
>>> > > >> a
>>> > > >> > > >>> certain
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Aaron
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Barr of the internet secuity firm HBGary Federal.
>>> Barr
>>> > > >> > claimed
>>> > > >> > > >>> that Q
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > is
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> co-founder of Anonymous, which is demonstrably
>>> false
>>> > (Q
>>> > > >> set
>>> > > >> > up
>>> > > >> > > >>> the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> #anonymous channel at
anonops.ru, which is simply
>>> an
>>> > > IRC
>>> > > >> > > >>> channel)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> that he is seeking replacements for OWen. OWen
>>> merely
>>> > > runs
>>> > > >> > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> owns
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > that
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> particular server, which as I told you is one of
>>> > several
>>> > > >> de
>>> > > >> > > facto
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> operational centers. Everyone involved laughed
>>> their
>>> > > >> assess
>>> > > >> > off
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > yesterday
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> and several of us wrote a silly press release
>>> which
>>> > was
>>> > > >> > > >>> thereafter
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > posted at
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Daily Kos and AnonNews. Barr, for his part, is
>>> > > reportedly
>>> > > >> set
>>> > > >> > > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> meet
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > with
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> the FBI tomorrow in order to provide them with
>>> info
>>> > > >> gleaned
>>> > > >> > > from
>>> > > >> > > >>> our
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> entirely non-secret IRC channels, and meanwhile
>>> his
>>> > > >> allegedly
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > successful
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> intel operation will no doubt help his firm
>>> acquire
>>> > > >> further
>>> > > >> > > >>> business.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> The only problem is that Anonymous has just taken
>>> over
>>> > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> website of
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> HBGary Federal founder Greg Hoglund and deleted
>>> all
>>> > > >> bakcups.
>>> > > >> > > >>> Suffice
>>> > > >> > > >>> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > say
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> that HBGary has attempted to interfere with a
>>> movement
>>> > > >> that
>>> > > >> > has
>>> > > >> > > >>> made
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> substantial contributions to the liberty and
>>> > well-being
>>> > > of
>>> > > >> > > North
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Africans
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> and others and will be further dealt with over the
>>> > > coming
>>> > > >> > > hours.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > Please
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > see:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
http://rootkit.com/. Enjoy the rest of your
>>> weekend.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM, barri2009 <
>>> > > >> > >
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> G. Whitney Leigh of Gonzalez and Leigh has taken
>>> the
>>> > > >> case.
>>> > > >> > His
>>> > > >> > > >>> > partner
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> was Ralph Nader's running mate. He'll be bringing
>>> in
>>> > > some
>>> > > >> > > "heavy
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > hitters,"
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> as he put it. Am still scheduled to speak to
>>> Stanley
>>> > > >> Cohen
>>> > > >> > > >>> tomorrow,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > after
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> which I'll put the two in touch. The EFF had said
>>> > > they'd
>>> > > >> > > assist
>>> > > >> > > >>> once
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > we had
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> a confirmed name and have just let them know.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Date: 04 Feb 2011 15:15:35
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> To: <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Subject: Re: do you have a couple of minutes to
>>> chat
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Thx. I'll keep that off the record but will keep
>>> in
>>> > > touch
>>> > > >> as
>>> > > >> > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > date
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> gets closer.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---- Original Message ----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> At: 2/4/2011 15:11
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Yeah, will do. Also, off the record, although
>>> > Anonymous
>>> > > >> as a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > movement
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> will
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> no doubt continue to some small extent with
>>> Yemen,
>>> > the
>>> > > >> 11th
>>> > > >> > is
>>> > > >> > > >>> the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> anniversary of Iran's revolution and I'm in
>>> > discussions
>>> > > >> with
>>> > > >> > > >>> both
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iranian
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> exiles and some of the more competent Anons about
>>> > > >> supplying
>>> > > >> > > >>> certain
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> tools to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Green folks ahead of that, and perhaps getting
>>> > involved
>>> > > >> > > further.
>>> > > >> > > >>> Our
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> concern
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> is that Anonymous is not yet equipped to handle
>>> such
>>> > a
>>> > > >> > > situation
>>> > > >> > > >>> as
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iran,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> which obviously involves a lot of nuance and
>>> > > interference
>>> > > >> > from
>>> > > >> > > >>> all
>>> > > >> > > >>> > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> great
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> powers and then some. Eritrea, meanwhile, is a
>>> police
>>> > > >> state
>>> > > >> > > with
>>> > > >> > > >>> a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > large
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> expat presence in the city in which I'm currently
>>> > > living
>>> > > >> and
>>> > > >> > > >>> I've
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> managed to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> get in touch with the exile opposition, which is
>>> > > >> > enthusiastic
>>> > > >> > > >>> about
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > any
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> attempt. That, too, would be a secret op run out
>>> of
>>> > > >> Project
>>> > > >> > PM
>>> > > >> > > >>> until
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> such
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> time as our cover is blown, at which point
>>> Anonymous
>>> > > will
>>> > > >> be
>>> > > >> > > >>> thrown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > at
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> them.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> I expect those operations to begin in two weeks.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>>> > > BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Can u let me know what he says?
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---- Original Message ----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > At: 2/4/2011 15:03
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Just heard back from Doron; Jay Mafield will be
>>> the
>>> > > >> > > attorney.
>>> > > >> > > >>> Am
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> supposed
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > talk to Doron in a bit.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
>>> > > >> BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> > NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Working on the attorneys. If it doesn't go
>>> today
>>> > it
>>> > > >> will
>>> > > >> > > go
>>> > > >> > > >>> on
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> monday.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > But
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > let me know if other reporters call and I'll
>>> try
>>> > > and
>>> > > >> > push
>>> > > >> > > >>> it.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---- Original Message ----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > At: 2/4/2011 13:59
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Did you manage to get a hold of everyone?
>>> Haven't
>>> > > had
>>> > > >> > any
>>> > > >> > > >>> other
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> interview
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > requests since we spoke so you're good.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM, MICHAEL
>>> RILEY,
>>> > > >> > BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > will do. thanks you.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > From: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > At: 2/03 16:57:02
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Here, just call him - 917-544-5471. His
>>> other
>>> > > >> number,
>>> > > >> > > >>> possibly
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> cell, is
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 845-482-3119. Try first one first, I don't
>>> know
>>> > > if
>>> > > >> he
>>> > > >> > > >>> wants me
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> giving
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > out
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > second one but I'm sure he won't mind since
>>> I'm
>>> > > >> going
>>> > > >> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> get
>>> > > >> > > >>> > him
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> paid
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > via
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > legal defense fund (off the record for
>>> now).
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MICHAEL
>>> RILEY,
>>> > > >> > > BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM: <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Hey, barrett. Will you do me a favor and
>>> > check
>>> > > >> the
>>> > > >> > > >>> earthlink
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> address
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > for
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Stanley. I tried it and it came back
>>> 'user
>>> > > >> unknown.'
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Also trying heidi.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > thx
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>>>
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > At: 2/03 13:50:29
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > No problem, will do.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, MICHAEL
>>> > RILEY,
>>> > > >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Thanks, I appreciate it. If you give
>>> this
>>> > to
>>> > > >> > anyone
>>> > > >> > > >>> else,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> could you
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > just
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > give me a heads up. That will give me
>>> an
>>> > idea
>>> > > >> that
>>> > > >> > I
>>> > > >> > > >>> > should
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> move as
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > quickly
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > as possible. My preference is to spend
>>> a
>>> > > little
>>> > > >> > more
>>> > > >> > > >>> time
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> talk
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > lawyers about this whole thing.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>>>
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/
>>> NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > At: 2/03 13:47:54
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > You're the first today. Anyway I'll
>>> make
>>> > sure
>>> > > >> you
>>> > > >> > > have
>>> > > >> > > >>> a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > head
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > start.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:44 PM,
>>> MICHAEL
>>> > > RILEY,
>>> > > >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > thanks, barrett. that's all a big
>>> help.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Can you tell me whether you've talked
>>> to
>>> > > >> other
>>> > > >> > > >>> reporters
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> about
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > this.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > I
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > have
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to run out to an interview and I'm
>>> just
>>> > > >> trying
>>> > > >> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> figure
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > out
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> if I
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > have
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > little time to talk Stanley or Heidi.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Again, much appreciated.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Cheers,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
>>> >
barriticus@gmail.com>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/
>>> NEWSROOM:)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > At: 2/03 13:33:26
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael-
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Good to meet you. Here's the info I
>>> have.
>>> > > Let
>>> > > >> me
>>> > > >> > > >>> know if
>>> > > >> > > >>> > I
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> forgot
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > anything.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Heidi Boghosian" <
director@nlg.org
>>> >,
>>> > > >> (NAtional
>>> > > >> > > >>> Lawyers
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Guild
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > director
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > whom I'm working to choose lawyers)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Stanley Cohen
>>> stanleycohen@earthlink.net-
>>> > > >> guy
>>> > > >> > > who
>>> > > >> > > >>> guys
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > on
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Fox
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > defends
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Hamas, lol
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jan/27/anonymous-internet
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > -
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > my op-ed from other day, with links
>>> to
>>> > info
>>> > > >> on
>>> > > >> > > >>> > OpTunisia,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> etc.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > As I mentioned, there are three
>>> people
>>> > I'm
>>> > > >> > > assisting
>>> > > >> > > >>> in
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> this.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Trivette" is a channel operator of
>>> > > >>
anonops.ru,
>>> > > >> > > >>> where a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> large
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > faction
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Anonymous movement does its work.
>>> He's a
>>> > > >> > > California
>>> > > >> > > >>> male
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> whose
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > documents
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > have (partially, it seems). Here is
>>> the
>>> > > >> entirety
>>> > > >> > > of
>>> > > >> > > >>> what
>>> > > >> > > >>> > I
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> have;
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > if
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > other
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > info is needed from him, let me know
>>> and
>>> > > I'll
>>> > > >> > get
>>> > > >> > > it
>>> > > >> > > >>> > ASAP.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> The
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > relevant
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > grand jury starts on Feb 10.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Subpoena
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4348/sub2sw.jpg
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Attachment to federal grand jury
>>> > subpoena:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> >
http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/1708/subz.jpg
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Owen" controls the anonops.ruserver.
>>> > He
>>> > > >> was
>>> > > >> > > >>> raided by
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> FBI
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > but
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > has
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > not
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > received any subpoena. He doesn't
>>> seem
>>> > > >> > interested
>>> > > >> > > in
>>> > > >> > > >>> any
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> legal
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > advice
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > until
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > such point as he is required to get
>>> off
>>> > his
>>> > > >> ass
>>> > > >> > by
>>> > > >> > > >>> the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Feds.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Rabbit"/"No" is a 19-year-old Nevada
>>> > > female.
>>> > > >> > Her
>>> > > >> > > >>> family
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> home was
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > raided
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > she was questioned at that point. She
>>> > > >> actually
>>> > > >> > > >>> called
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > right
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> after
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > I
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > got
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > off
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with you and told me the following:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Equipment seized:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two broken laptops
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two jump drives
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > father's laptop
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > mac book
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > samsung phone
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > iphone
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > router
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > The search warrant was shown to her
>>> only
>>> > > >> after
>>> > > >> > she
>>> > > >> > > >>> had
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> requested
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > see
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > it
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > several times and was questioned
>>> about
>>> > > >> > MasterCard
>>> > > >> > > >>> etc
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > (it's
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > looking
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > like
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > MIAA thing may just be peripheral or
>>> even
>>> > > >> > > unrelated,
>>> > > >> > > >>> as
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > I'm
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> just
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > now
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > able
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > determine). It's headlined United
>>> States
>>> > > >> > District
>>> > > >> > > >>> Court
>>> > > >> > > >>> > of
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Nevada.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > According
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to one section, it was supposed to be
>>> > > carried
>>> > > >> > out
>>> > > >> > > by
>>> > > >> > > >>> Feb
>>> > > >> > > >>> > 9
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > -
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> one
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > day
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > before
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the California grand jury goes down.
>>> > She'll
>>> > > >> be
>>> > > >> > > able
>>> > > >> > > >>> to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > scan
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> it
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > get
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > it
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you or whoever ends up assisting by
>>> > > Thursday
>>> > > >> but
>>> > > >> > > >>> it's in
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > reference
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > her
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > having allegedly accessed a secure
>>> > computer
>>> > > >> to
>>> > > >> > > >>> obtain
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > information,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 18
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > U.S.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > c
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 1030a2c.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:57 AM,
>>> Barrett
>>> > > >> Brown <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
barriticus@gmail.com
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Michael-
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Sure, give me a call at
>>> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> whenever.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:52 AM,
>>> > MICHAEL
>>> > > >> > RILEY,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > BLOOMBERG/
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > NEWSROOM:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > <
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Hey, Barrett.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> I'm working on a story about the
>>> DoJ's
>>> > > >> > efforts
>>> > > >> > > to
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> prosecute
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > individuals
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> associated with Anonymous and the
>>> DDoS
>>> > > >> > attacks
>>> > > >> > > >>> > against
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> PayPal
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > and
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > others.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> The NYT mentioned that you're
>>> helping
>>> > to
>>> > > >> > > organize
>>> > > >> > > >>> > legal
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > assistance
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > for
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> some of those arrested and
>>> released
>>> > > >> recently.
>>> > > >> > > Do
>>> > > >> > > >>> you
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > have
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> a
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > couple
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> minutes to talk. I'm interested in
>>> > your
>>> > > >> sense
>>> > > >> > > of
>>> > > >> > > >>> what
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> DoJ's
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > strategy
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > is
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> here. Is this about making some
>>> > examples
>>> > > >> from
>>> > > >> > a
>>> > > >> > > >>> few
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> people
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > associated
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Anonymous. Are they trying to go
>>> after
>>> > > >> > leaders
>>> > > >> > > in
>>> > > >> > > >>> the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> hopes of
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > beheading
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> group (which seems unlikely, give
>>> the
>>> > > >> > nature).
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> And I'm also just interested in
>>> what
>>> > > >> exactly
>>> > > >> > > >>> people
>>> > > >> > > >>> > are
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> being
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > charged
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> with. From a legal perspective,
>>> this
>>> > is
>>> > > a
>>> > > >> > > tricky
>>> > > >> > > >>> move
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > on
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> their
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > part.
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Cheers,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Michael Riley
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (202) 624 1982
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> > >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > --
>>> > > >> > > >>> > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>> > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>> >
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> --
>>> > > >> > > >>> Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>> Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >>> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >> --
>>> > > >> > > >> Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >> Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > >> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >>
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > --
>>> > > >> > > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > --
>>> > > >> > > Regards,
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > --
>>> > > >> > Regards,
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> --
>>> > > >> Regards,
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Barrett Brown
>>> > > >> 512-560-2302
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > > 512-560-2302
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Barrett Brown
>>> > > 512-560-2302
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Barrett Brown
>>> > 512-560-2302
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Barrett Brown
>>> 512-560-2302
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Barrett Brown
>> 512-560-2302
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302