Re: rabbit/no search warrant
Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 2/7/11, 20:07
To: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <michaelriley@bloomberg.net>

Also, I recorded the call, as well as the one with Penny, and did so here in Texas where I'm allowed to do so.

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
Nice.

Thanks again.

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At:  2/07 20:05:55

Download an IRC client like Icechat and come to irc.anonops.ru #ophbgary or
#reporters. Someone will help you.

Also, I probably noted that Aaron was telling me last night that wasn't
attempting to hurt us. Please see this draft of a Crowdleaks article, which
includes an e-mail in which Aaron brags about various things.
https://uloadr.com/u/55.png

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:

> Thanks for the tip.
>
> I haven't tried it myself but will tonight. How exactly do I find the
> emails? I'd like to get in the queue and have a look what's in there...
>
> Cheers,
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Riley
> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> (202) 624 1982
> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> At:  2/07 18:30:43
>
> I'd hurry on the e-mail, though, they're going through all of them on IRC
> and reporters are in. Luckily there are lots of e-mails, lol.
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > nice. thank you.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Michael Riley
> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > (202) 624 1982
> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > At:  2/07 18:13:57
> >
> > Attached, a screenshot of that e-mail thread. Enjoy.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dude, I have so many enemies at this point that I can't even remember
> > their
> > > names. Also, lol @ Karen.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> terrific. thanks. funny story: i asked karen about the email and she
> > said
> > >> that she didn't know anything about it. that's before i knew it was
> > >> addressed to her.
> > >>
> > >> it is going to be hard to deny knowledge when she read it in her inbox
> > on
> > >> saturday.
> > >>
> > >> remind me never to get on your bad side. lol.
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> Michael Riley
> > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> (202) 624 1982
> > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> At:  2/07 17:57:07
> > >>
> > >> <greg@hbgary.com> Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM
> > >> To: Karen Burke <karen@hbgary.com>
> > >> Cc: Aaron Barr <aaron@hbgary.com>
> > >> Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
> > >> I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would be interesting
> > >> to leave the soft impression that Aaron is the one thatgot them, and
> > >> that without Aaron the Feds would have never been able to get out of
> > >> their own way. So, position Aaron as a hero to the public. At this
> > >> point they are going to get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some
> > >> concerns on how that might affect commerical business (although I'm
> > >> not clear on why yet)
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> > >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I just have a couple of questions about the email. My editors want
> to
> > >> get
> > >> > as much authentication as we can.
> > >> >
> > >> > what is that address of the account that it's from -- greg's
> account,
> > i
> > >> > guess (i assume it's on corporate email but could be them using a
> > public
> > >> > email server, i suppose). and who was the email address to?
> > >> >
> > >> > and is it formatted in the way you guys have it? in other words, can
> > we
> > >> see
> > >> > the whole thing with the to, from, su, etc?
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > Michael Riley
> > >> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> >
> > >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > At:  2/07 17:34:57
> > >> >
> > >> > Okay, but only because I like you. I gave OWen your e-mail, he'll be
> > in
> > >> > touch soon.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:
> <
> > >> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Okay. I'll put that in the story. that's great stuff. can we have
> > that
> > >> > > exclusively?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > At:  2/07 17:08:01
> > >> > >
> > >> > > And that e-mail is timestamped  Sat, feb 5, 9.02am. Still bugging
> > Owen
> > >> > for
> > >> > > state.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Barrett Brown <
> barriticus@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Meanwhile, having gone through the e-mails that were acquired,
> we
> > >> have
> > >> > > > discovered the following message from Greg at HBGary Federal:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > "I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would be
> > >> interesting
> > >> > > > toleave the soft impression that Aaron is the one that got them,
> > and
> > >> > > > thatwithout Aaron the Feds would have never been able to get out
> > of
> > >> > > theirown
> > >> > > > way.So, position Aaron as a hero to the public. But point they
> are
> > >> > going
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some concerns on how that
> > might
> > >> > > affect
> > >> > > > commerical business although not clear on why yet"
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Mail ID:  mail 1297012949.M839500P25652Q2423
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Barrett Brown <
> > barriticus@gmail.com
> > >> > > >wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> "no they did not seize a server form me. just acouple of my
> boxes
> > >> and
> > >> > > >> CD/DVDs
> > >> > > >> [16:00] <owen> also my blakcberry"
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Still waiting for him to tell me what state.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
> > NEWSROOM:
> > >> <
> > >> > > >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> thx. i'm trying to run the story this evening (so it shows up
> on
> > >> the
> > >> > > web
> > >> > > >>> early tomorrow). Let me know as soon as possible what you
> get...
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> At:  2/07 17:00:26
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> I've sent him a message asking, will let you know.
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
> > >> NEWSROOM: <
> > >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > ok. if you could confirm if they took the server.
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > And I just need the a state for Owen. We can just use his
> > cyber
> > >> > > handle,
> > >> > > >>> but
> > >> > > >>> > i need to show where the FBI seized the stuff. Not a city.
> > Just
> > >> > > state.
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > At:  2/07 16:42:08
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > No, Owen isn't in NYC. That's one of the many things that
> > Aaron
> > >> got
> > >> > > >>> wrong,
> > >> > > >>> > including my supposed other handles. I've heard from one
> > fellow
> > >> who
> > >> > > >>> plans
> > >> > > >>> > to
> > >> > > >>> > sue.
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > The feds took quite a bit of equipment from Owen but not all
> > of
> > >> it.
> > >> > > >>> Pretty
> > >> > > >>> > sure they took a server but want to confirm before I say yes
> > or
> > >> no.
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
> > >> NEWSROOM:
> > >> > <
> > >> > > >>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > owen is in new york state, is that right?
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > And did the fbi actually take the server?
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > At:  2/07 15:27:56
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > Basically, we got hbgary's e-mails along with hbgary
> > >> federal's.
> > >> > > Prez,
> > >> > > >>> > > penny, called me to make the distinction. I told her to
> come
> > >> into
> > >> > > irc
> > >> > > >>> to
> > >> > > >>> > > talk. She and greg whatshisname, who is a douche, were in
> > for
> > >> a
> > >> > > >>> couple
> > >> > > >>> > > hours. I don't think a consensus has been reached on our
> end
> > >> as
> > >> > > >>> regards
> > >> > > >>> > what
> > >> > > >>> > > to do, but anyway I don't think the e-mails have yet been
> > >> > > downloaded
> > >> > > >>> by
> > >> > > >>> > > anyone because file isn't being sufficiently seeded via
> > >> torrent,
> > >> > so
> > >> > > >>> there
> > >> > > >>> > > may still be time to come to a decision. I like penny but
> > some
> > >> > > others
> > >> > > >>> > don't
> > >> > > >>> > > trust her on this matter when she claims to be angry with
> > >> aaron,
> > >> > > etc.
> > >> > > >>> > > Meanwhile greg has made some threatening statements to the
> > >> press
> > >> > > so,
> > >> > > >>> > yeah,
> > >> > > >>> > > that wasn't particularly brilliant of him.
> > >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
> > >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
> > >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 15:21:01
> > >> > > >>> > > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > I bet. Busy I mean.
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > Can you tell me what the negotiations are about? I can put
> a
> > >> > couple
> > >> > > >>> of
> > >> > > >>> > > graphs in the story...
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > At:  2/07 15:02:32
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > Don't have it yet, will try. Been busy. Spoke to
> principals
> > of
> > >> > > hbgary
> > >> > > >>> > last
> > >> > > >>> > > night, negotiations, etc.
> > >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
> > >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
> > >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 10:17:08
> > >> > > >>> > > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > Subject: rabbit/no search warrant
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > Hey Barrett. Do you have a scanned copy of the search
> > warrant
> > >> the
> > >> > > >>> feds
> > >> > > >>> > gave
> > >> > > >>> > > rabbit/no during the search?
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > At:  2/06 20:50:33
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/2/6/941730/-Anonymous-pwns-HBGary-Federal
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Barrett Brown <
> > >> > > barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > > Also, we've acquired the document that HBGary was to
> sell
> > to
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >>> FBI.
> > >> > > >>> > I'm
> > >> > > >>> > > > mentioned a couple of times, including an occasion on
> > which
> > >> I
> > >> > > asked
> > >> > > >>> > > people
> > >> > > >>> > > > to attend a meeting on building dark nets.
> > >> > > http://hizost.com/d/zjb
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Barrett Brown <
> > >> > > >>> barriticus@gmail.com
> > >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >> Also, Anon has taken down HBGary's website, acquired
> > 60,000
> > >> > > >>> e-mails,
> > >> > > >>> > > >> destroyed backup files, acquired Barr's Twitter (
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > https://twitter.com/#!/aaronbarr/status/34395565458456576
> > >> ),
> > >> > and
> > >> > > >>> more.
> > >> > > >>> > > >> Barr is currently in irc.anonops.ru pleading with us.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Barrett Brown <
> > >> > > >>> barriticus@gmail.com
> > >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> Michael-
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> You may have seen yesterday's Financial Times piece
> > which
> > >> > > claimed
> > >> > > >>> > that
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> the operational heads of Anonymous had been identified
> > by
> > >> a
> > >> > > >>> certain
> > >> > > >>> > > Aaron
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> Barr of the internet secuity firm HBGary Federal. Barr
> > >> > claimed
> > >> > > >>> that Q
> > >> > > >>> > > is
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> co-founder of Anonymous, which is demonstrably false
> (Q
> > >> set
> > >> > up
> > >> > > >>> the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> #anonymous channel at anonops.ru, which is simply an
> > IRC
> > >> > > >>> channel)
> > >> > > >>> > and
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> that he is seeking replacements for OWen. OWen merely
> > runs
> > >> > and
> > >> > > >>> owns
> > >> > > >>> > > that
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> particular server, which as I told you is one of
> several
> > >> de
> > >> > > facto
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> operational centers. Everyone involved laughed their
> > >> assess
> > >> > off
> > >> > > >>> > > yesterday
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> and several of us wrote a silly press release which
> was
> > >> > > >>> thereafter
> > >> > > >>> > > posted at
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> Daily Kos and AnonNews. Barr, for his part, is
> > reportedly
> > >> set
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > >>> meet
> > >> > > >>> > > with
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> the FBI tomorrow in order to provide them with info
> > >> gleaned
> > >> > > from
> > >> > > >>> our
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> entirely non-secret IRC channels, and meanwhile his
> > >> allegedly
> > >> > > >>> > > successful
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> intel operation will no doubt help his firm acquire
> > >> further
> > >> > > >>> business.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> The only problem is that Anonymous has just taken over
> > the
> > >> > > >>> website of
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> HBGary Federal founder Greg Hoglund and deleted all
> > >> bakcups.
> > >> > > >>> Suffice
> > >> > > >>> > to
> > >> > > >>> > > say
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> that HBGary has attempted to interfere with a movement
> > >> that
> > >> > has
> > >> > > >>> made
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> substantial contributions to the liberty and
> well-being
> > of
> > >> > > North
> > >> > > >>> > > Africans
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> and others and will be further dealt with over the
> > coming
> > >> > > hours.
> > >> > > >>> > Please
> > >> > > >>> > > see:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> http://rootkit.com/. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM, barri2009 <
> > >> > > barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> G. Whitney Leigh of Gonzalez and Leigh has taken the
> > >> case.
> > >> > His
> > >> > > >>> > partner
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> was Ralph Nader's running mate. He'll be bringing in
> > some
> > >> > > "heavy
> > >> > > >>> > > hitters,"
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> as he put it. Am still scheduled to speak to Stanley
> > >> Cohen
> > >> > > >>> tomorrow,
> > >> > > >>> > > after
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> which I'll put the two in touch. The EFF had said
> > they'd
> > >> > > assist
> > >> > > >>> once
> > >> > > >>> > > we had
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> a confirmed name and have just let them know.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
> > >> > > >>> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Date: 04 Feb 2011 15:15:35
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Subject: Re: do you have a couple of minutes to chat
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Thx. I'll keep that off the record but will keep in
> > touch
> > >> as
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > >>> > date
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> gets closer.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---- Original Message ----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> At: 2/4/2011 15:11
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Yeah, will do. Also, off the record, although
> Anonymous
> > >> as a
> > >> > > >>> > movement
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> will
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> no doubt continue to some small extent with Yemen,
> the
> > >> 11th
> > >> > is
> > >> > > >>> the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> anniversary of Iran's revolution and I'm in
> discussions
> > >> with
> > >> > > >>> both
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iranian
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> exiles and some of the more competent Anons about
> > >> supplying
> > >> > > >>> certain
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> tools to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Green folks ahead of that, and perhaps getting
> involved
> > >> > > further.
> > >> > > >>> Our
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> concern
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> is that Anonymous is not yet equipped to handle such
> a
> > >> > > situation
> > >> > > >>> as
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iran,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> which obviously involves a lot of nuance and
> > interference
> > >> > from
> > >> > > >>> all
> > >> > > >>> > the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> great
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> powers and then some. Eritrea, meanwhile, is a police
> > >> state
> > >> > > with
> > >> > > >>> a
> > >> > > >>> > > large
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> expat presence in the city in which I'm currently
> > living
> > >> and
> > >> > > >>> I've
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> managed to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> get in touch with the exile opposition, which is
> > >> > enthusiastic
> > >> > > >>> about
> > >> > > >>> > > any
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> attempt. That, too, would be a secret op run out of
> > >> Project
> > >> > PM
> > >> > > >>> until
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> such
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> time as our cover is blown, at which point Anonymous
> > will
> > >> be
> > >> > > >>> thrown
> > >> > > >>> > at
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> them.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> I expect those operations to begin in two weeks.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> > BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> NEWSROOM:
> > >> > > >>> > <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Can u let me know what he says?
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---- Original Message ----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > At: 2/4/2011 15:03
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Just heard back from Doron; Jay Mafield will be the
> > >> > > attorney.
> > >> > > >>> Am
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> supposed
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > talk to Doron in a bit.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> > >> BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> > NEWSROOM:
> > >> > > >>> > > <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Working on the attorneys. If it doesn't go today
> it
> > >> will
> > >> > > go
> > >> > > >>> on
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> monday.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > But
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > let me know if other reporters call and I'll try
> > and
> > >> > push
> > >> > > >>> it.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---- Original Message ----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > At: 2/4/2011 13:59
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Did you manage to get a hold of everyone? Haven't
> > had
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >>> other
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> interview
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > requests since we spoke so you're good.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> > >> > BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> > > NEWSROOM:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > will do. thanks you.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > At:  2/03 16:57:02
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Here, just call him - 917-544-5471. His other
> > >> number,
> > >> > > >>> possibly
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> cell, is
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 845-482-3119. Try first one first, I don't know
> > if
> > >> he
> > >> > > >>> wants me
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> giving
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > out
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > second one but I'm sure he won't mind since I'm
> > >> going
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >>> get
> > >> > > >>> > him
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> paid
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > via
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > a
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > legal defense fund (off the record for now).
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> > >> > > BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM: <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Hey, barrett. Will you do me a favor and
> check
> > >> the
> > >> > > >>> earthlink
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> address
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > for
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Stanley. I tried it and it came back 'user
> > >> unknown.'
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Also trying heidi.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > thx
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > At:  2/03 13:50:29
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > No problem, will do.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, MICHAEL
> RILEY,
> > >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Thanks, I appreciate it. If you give this
> to
> > >> > anyone
> > >> > > >>> else,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> could you
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > just
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > give me a heads up. That will give me an
> idea
> > >> that
> > >> > I
> > >> > > >>> > should
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> move as
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > quickly
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > as possible. My preference is to spend a
> > little
> > >> > more
> > >> > > >>> time
> > >> > > >>> > > and
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> talk
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > lawyers about this whole thing.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > At:  2/03 13:47:54
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > You're the first today. Anyway I'll make
> sure
> > >> you
> > >> > > have
> > >> > > >>> a
> > >> > > >>> > > head
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > start.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:44 PM, MICHAEL
> > RILEY,
> > >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > NEWSROOM:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > thanks, barrett. that's all a big help.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Can you tell me whether you've talked to
> > >> other
> > >> > > >>> reporters
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> about
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > this.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > I
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > have
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to run out to an interview and I'm just
> > >> trying
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >>> figure
> > >> > > >>> > > out
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> if I
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > have
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > a
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > little time to talk Stanley or Heidi.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Again, much appreciated.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <
> barriticus@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > At:  2/03 13:33:26
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael-
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Good to meet you. Here's the info I have.
> > Let
> > >> me
> > >> > > >>> know if
> > >> > > >>> > I
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> forgot
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > anything.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Heidi Boghosian" <director@nlg.org>,
> > >> (NAtional
> > >> > > >>> Lawyers
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Guild
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > director
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > whom I'm working to choose lawyers)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Stanley Cohen stanleycohen@earthlink.net-
> > >> guy
> > >> > > who
> > >> > > >>> guys
> > >> > > >>> > > on
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Fox
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > defends
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Hamas, lol
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jan/27/anonymous-internet
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > -
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > my op-ed from other day, with links to
> info
> > >> on
> > >> > > >>> > OpTunisia,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> etc.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > As I mentioned, there are three people
> I'm
> > >> > > assisting
> > >> > > >>> in
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> this.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Trivette" is a channel operator of
> > >> anonops.ru,
> > >> > > >>> where a
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> large
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > faction
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Anonymous movement does its work. He's a
> > >> > > California
> > >> > > >>> male
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> whose
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > documents
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > have (partially, it seems). Here is the
> > >> entirety
> > >> > > of
> > >> > > >>> what
> > >> > > >>> > I
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> have;
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > if
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > other
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > info is needed from him, let me know and
> > I'll
> > >> > get
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > >>> > ASAP.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> The
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > relevant
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > grand jury starts on Feb 10.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Subpoena
> > >> > > >>> > http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4348/sub2sw.jpg
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Attachment to federal grand jury
> subpoena:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/1708/subz.jpg
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Owen" controls the anonops.ru server.
> He
> > >> was
> > >> > > >>> raided by
> > >> > > >>> > > the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> FBI
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > but
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > has
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > not
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > received any subpoena. He doesn't seem
> > >> > interested
> > >> > > in
> > >> > > >>> any
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> legal
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > advice
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > until
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > such point as he is required to get off
> his
> > >> ass
> > >> > by
> > >> > > >>> the
> > >> > > >>> > > Feds.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Rabbit"/"No" is a 19-year-old Nevada
> > female.
> > >> > Her
> > >> > > >>> family
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> home was
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > raided
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > and
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > she was questioned at that point. She
> > >> actually
> > >> > > >>> called
> > >> > > >>> > > right
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> after
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > I
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > got
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > off
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with you and told me the following:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Equipment seized:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two broken laptops
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two jump drives
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > father's laptop
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > mac book
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > samsung phone
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > iphone
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > router
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > The search warrant was shown to her only
> > >> after
> > >> > she
> > >> > > >>> had
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> requested
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > see
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > it
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > several times and was questioned about
> > >> > MasterCard
> > >> > > >>> etc
> > >> > > >>> > > (it's
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > looking
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > like
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > MIAA thing may just be peripheral or even
> > >> > > unrelated,
> > >> > > >>> as
> > >> > > >>> > > I'm
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> just
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > now
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > able
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > determine). It's headlined United States
> > >> > District
> > >> > > >>> Court
> > >> > > >>> > of
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Nevada.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > According
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to one section, it was supposed to be
> > carried
> > >> > out
> > >> > > by
> > >> > > >>> Feb
> > >> > > >>> > 9
> > >> > > >>> > > -
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> one
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > day
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > before
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the California grand jury goes down.
> She'll
> > >> be
> > >> > > able
> > >> > > >>> to
> > >> > > >>> > > scan
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> it
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > get
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > it
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you or whoever ends up assisting by
> > Thursday
> > >> but
> > >> > > >>> it's in
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > reference
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > her
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > having allegedly accessed a secure
> computer
> > >> to
> > >> > > >>> obtain
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > information,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 18
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > U.S.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > c
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 1030a2c.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Barrett
> > >> Brown <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > barriticus@gmail.com
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Michael-
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Sure, give me a call at 512-560-2302
> > >> whenever.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:52 AM,
> MICHAEL
> > >> > RILEY,
> > >> > > >>> > > BLOOMBERG/
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > NEWSROOM:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > <
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Hey, Barrett.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> I'm working on a story about the DoJ's
> > >> > efforts
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> prosecute
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > individuals
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> associated with Anonymous and the DDoS
> > >> > attacks
> > >> > > >>> > against
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> PayPal
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > and
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > others.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> The NYT mentioned that you're helping
> to
> > >> > > organize
> > >> > > >>> > legal
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > assistance
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > for
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> some of those arrested and released
> > >> recently.
> > >> > > Do
> > >> > > >>> you
> > >> > > >>> > > have
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> a
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > couple
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> minutes to talk. I'm interested in
> your
> > >> sense
> > >> > > of
> > >> > > >>> what
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> DoJ's
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > strategy
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > is
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> here. Is this about making some
> examples
> > >> from
> > >> > a
> > >> > > >>> few
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> people
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > associated
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Anonymous. Are they trying to go after
> > >> > leaders
> > >> > > in
> > >> > > >>> the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> hopes of
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > beheading
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> group (which seems unlikely, give the
> > >> > nature).
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> And I'm also just interested in what
> > >> exactly
> > >> > > >>> people
> > >> > > >>> > are
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> being
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > charged
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> with. From a legal perspective, this
> is
> > a
> > >> > > tricky
> > >> > > >>> move
> > >> > > >>> > > on
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> their
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > part.
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Michael Riley
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (202) 624 1982
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>> 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> --
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >> --
> > >> > > >>> > > >> Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >> Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > >> 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> > >
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > --
> > >> > > >>> > Regards,
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>> > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>> >
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> --
> > >> > > >>> Regards,
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >>> 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> --
> > >> > > >> Regards,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Barrett Brown
> > >> > > >> 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Barrett Brown
> > >> > > 512-560-2302
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> > Barrett Brown
> > >> > 512-560-2302
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Barrett Brown
> > >> 512-560-2302
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Barrett Brown
> > > 512-560-2302
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Barrett Brown
> > 512-560-2302
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302