Re: rabbit/no search warrant
Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 2/7/11, 20:05
To: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <michaelriley@bloomberg.net>

Download an IRC client like Icechat and come to irc.anonops.ru #ophbgary or #reporters. Someone will help you.

Also, I probably noted that Aaron was telling me last night that wasn't attempting to hurt us. Please see this draft of a Crowdleaks article, which includes an e-mail in which Aaron brags about various things. https://uloadr.com/u/55.png

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
Thanks for the tip.

I haven't tried it myself but will tonight. How exactly do I find the emails? I'd like to get in the queue and have a look what's in there...

Cheers,

------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riley
Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
(202) 624 1982
(720) 635 8553 (cell)

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
At:  2/07 18:30:43

I'd hurry on the e-mail, though, they're going through all of them on IRC
and reporters are in. Luckily there are lots of e-mails, lol.

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:

> nice. thank you.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Riley
> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> (202) 624 1982
> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> At:  2/07 18:13:57
>
> Attached, a screenshot of that e-mail thread. Enjoy.
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dude, I have so many enemies at this point that I can't even remember
> their
> > names. Also, lol @ Karen.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >
> >> terrific. thanks. funny story: i asked karen about the email and she
> said
> >> that she didn't know anything about it. that's before i knew it was
> >> addressed to her.
> >>
> >> it is going to be hard to deny knowledge when she read it in her inbox
> on
> >> saturday.
> >>
> >> remind me never to get on your bad side. lol.
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Michael Riley
> >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> (202) 624 1982
> >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> At:  2/07 17:57:07
> >>
> >> <greg@hbgary.com> Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM
> >> To: Karen Burke <karen@hbgary.com>
> >> Cc: Aaron Barr <aaron@hbgary.com>
> >> Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
> >> I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would be interesting
> >> to leave the soft impression that Aaron is the one thatgot them, and
> >> that without Aaron the Feds would have never been able to get out of
> >> their own way. So, position Aaron as a hero to the public. At this
> >> point they are going to get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some
> >> concerns on how that might affect commerical business (although I'm
> >> not clear on why yet)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I just have a couple of questions about the email. My editors want to
> >> get
> >> > as much authentication as we can.
> >> >
> >> > what is that address of the account that it's from -- greg's account,
> i
> >> > guess (i assume it's on corporate email but could be them using a
> public
> >> > email server, i suppose). and who was the email address to?
> >> >
> >> > and is it formatted in the way you guys have it? in other words, can
> we
> >> see
> >> > the whole thing with the to, from, su, etc?
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > Michael Riley
> >> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > (202) 624 1982
> >> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > At:  2/07 17:34:57
> >> >
> >> > Okay, but only because I like you. I gave OWen your e-mail, he'll be
> in
> >> > touch soon.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: <
> >> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Okay. I'll put that in the story. that's great stuff. can we have
> that
> >> > > exclusively?
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > Michael Riley
> >> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > At:  2/07 17:08:01
> >> > >
> >> > > And that e-mail is timestamped  Sat, feb 5, 9.02am. Still bugging
> Owen
> >> > for
> >> > > state.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Meanwhile, having gone through the e-mails that were acquired, we
> >> have
> >> > > > discovered the following message from Greg at HBGary Federal:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "I think these guys are going to get arrested, it would be
> >> interesting
> >> > > > toleave the soft impression that Aaron is the one that got them,
> and
> >> > > > thatwithout Aaron the Feds would have never been able to get out
> of
> >> > > theirown
> >> > > > way.So, position Aaron as a hero to the public. But point they are
> >> > going
> >> > > to
> >> > > > get arrested anyway. But, Aaron has some concerns on how that
> might
> >> > > affect
> >> > > > commerical business although not clear on why yet"
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Mail ID:  mail 1297012949.M839500P25652Q2423
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Barrett Brown <
> barriticus@gmail.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> "no they did not seize a server form me. just acouple of my boxes
> >> and
> >> > > >> CD/DVDs
> >> > > >> [16:00] <owen> also my blakcberry"
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Still waiting for him to tell me what state.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
> NEWSROOM:
> >> <
> >> > > >> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> thx. i'm trying to run the story this evening (so it shows up on
> >> the
> >> > > web
> >> > > >>> early tomorrow). Let me know as soon as possible what you get...
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> At:  2/07 17:00:26
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> I've sent him a message asking, will let you know.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
> >> NEWSROOM: <
> >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > ok. if you could confirm if they took the server.
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > And I just need the a state for Owen. We can just use his
> cyber
> >> > > handle,
> >> > > >>> but
> >> > > >>> > i need to show where the FBI seized the stuff. Not a city.
> Just
> >> > > state.
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > At:  2/07 16:42:08
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > No, Owen isn't in NYC. That's one of the many things that
> Aaron
> >> got
> >> > > >>> wrong,
> >> > > >>> > including my supposed other handles. I've heard from one
> fellow
> >> who
> >> > > >>> plans
> >> > > >>> > to
> >> > > >>> > sue.
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > The feds took quite a bit of equipment from Owen but not all
> of
> >> it.
> >> > > >>> Pretty
> >> > > >>> > sure they took a server but want to confirm before I say yes
> or
> >> no.
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/
> >> NEWSROOM:
> >> > <
> >> > > >>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > > owen is in new york state, is that right?
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > And did the fbi actually take the server?
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > At:  2/07 15:27:56
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > Basically, we got hbgary's e-mails along with hbgary
> >> federal's.
> >> > > Prez,
> >> > > >>> > > penny, called me to make the distinction. I told her to come
> >> into
> >> > > irc
> >> > > >>> to
> >> > > >>> > > talk. She and greg whatshisname, who is a douche, were in
> for
> >> a
> >> > > >>> couple
> >> > > >>> > > hours. I don't think a consensus has been reached on our end
> >> as
> >> > > >>> regards
> >> > > >>> > what
> >> > > >>> > > to do, but anyway I don't think the e-mails have yet been
> >> > > downloaded
> >> > > >>> by
> >> > > >>> > > anyone because file isn't being sufficiently seeded via
> >> torrent,
> >> > so
> >> > > >>> there
> >> > > >>> > > may still be time to come to a decision. I like penny but
> some
> >> > > others
> >> > > >>> > don't
> >> > > >>> > > trust her on this matter when she claims to be angry with
> >> aaron,
> >> > > etc.
> >> > > >>> > > Meanwhile greg has made some threatening statements to the
> >> press
> >> > > so,
> >> > > >>> > yeah,
> >> > > >>> > > that wasn't particularly brilliant of him.
> >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
> >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
> >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 15:21:01
> >> > > >>> > > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > Subject: Re: rabbit/no search warrant
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > I bet. Busy I mean.
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > Can you tell me what the negotiations are about? I can put a
> >> > couple
> >> > > >>> of
> >> > > >>> > > graphs in the story...
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > From: Barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > At:  2/07 15:02:32
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > Don't have it yet, will try. Been busy. Spoke to principals
> of
> >> > > hbgary
> >> > > >>> > last
> >> > > >>> > > night, negotiations, etc.
> >> > > >>> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >>> > > From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
> >> > > >>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net>
> >> > > >>> > > Date: 07 Feb 2011 10:17:08
> >> > > >>> > > To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > Subject: rabbit/no search warrant
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > Hey Barrett. Do you have a scanned copy of the search
> warrant
> >> the
> >> > > >>> feds
> >> > > >>> > gave
> >> > > >>> > > rabbit/no during the search?
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > At:  2/06 20:50:33
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/2/6/941730/-Anonymous-pwns-HBGary-Federal
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Barrett Brown <
> >> > > barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > > Also, we've acquired the document that HBGary was to sell
> to
> >> > the
> >> > > >>> FBI.
> >> > > >>> > I'm
> >> > > >>> > > > mentioned a couple of times, including an occasion on
> which
> >> I
> >> > > asked
> >> > > >>> > > people
> >> > > >>> > > > to attend a meeting on building dark nets.
> >> > > http://hizost.com/d/zjb
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Barrett Brown <
> >> > > >>> barriticus@gmail.com
> >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >> Also, Anon has taken down HBGary's website, acquired
> 60,000
> >> > > >>> e-mails,
> >> > > >>> > > >> destroyed backup files, acquired Barr's Twitter (
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> https://twitter.com/#!/aaronbarr/status/34395565458456576
> >> ),
> >> > and
> >> > > >>> more.
> >> > > >>> > > >> Barr is currently in irc.anonops.ru pleading with us.
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Barrett Brown <
> >> > > >>> barriticus@gmail.com
> >> > > >>> > > >wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>> Michael-
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>> You may have seen yesterday's Financial Times piece
> which
> >> > > claimed
> >> > > >>> > that
> >> > > >>> > > >>> the operational heads of Anonymous had been identified
> by
> >> a
> >> > > >>> certain
> >> > > >>> > > Aaron
> >> > > >>> > > >>> Barr of the internet secuity firm HBGary Federal. Barr
> >> > claimed
> >> > > >>> that Q
> >> > > >>> > > is
> >> > > >>> > > >>> co-founder of Anonymous, which is demonstrably false (Q
> >> set
> >> > up
> >> > > >>> the
> >> > > >>> > > >>> #anonymous channel at anonops.ru, which is simply an
> IRC
> >> > > >>> channel)
> >> > > >>> > and
> >> > > >>> > > >>> that he is seeking replacements for OWen. OWen merely
> runs
> >> > and
> >> > > >>> owns
> >> > > >>> > > that
> >> > > >>> > > >>> particular server, which as I told you is one of several
> >> de
> >> > > facto
> >> > > >>> > > >>> operational centers. Everyone involved laughed their
> >> assess
> >> > off
> >> > > >>> > > yesterday
> >> > > >>> > > >>> and several of us wrote a silly press release which was
> >> > > >>> thereafter
> >> > > >>> > > posted at
> >> > > >>> > > >>> Daily Kos and AnonNews. Barr, for his part, is
> reportedly
> >> set
> >> > > to
> >> > > >>> meet
> >> > > >>> > > with
> >> > > >>> > > >>> the FBI tomorrow in order to provide them with info
> >> gleaned
> >> > > from
> >> > > >>> our
> >> > > >>> > > >>> entirely non-secret IRC channels, and meanwhile his
> >> allegedly
> >> > > >>> > > successful
> >> > > >>> > > >>> intel operation will no doubt help his firm acquire
> >> further
> >> > > >>> business.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>> The only problem is that Anonymous has just taken over
> the
> >> > > >>> website of
> >> > > >>> > > >>> HBGary Federal founder Greg Hoglund and deleted all
> >> bakcups.
> >> > > >>> Suffice
> >> > > >>> > to
> >> > > >>> > > say
> >> > > >>> > > >>> that HBGary has attempted to interfere with a movement
> >> that
> >> > has
> >> > > >>> made
> >> > > >>> > > >>> substantial contributions to the liberty and well-being
> of
> >> > > North
> >> > > >>> > > Africans
> >> > > >>> > > >>> and others and will be further dealt with over the
> coming
> >> > > hours.
> >> > > >>> > Please
> >> > > >>> > > see:
> >> > > >>> > > >>> http://rootkit.com/. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM, barri2009 <
> >> > > barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> G. Whitney Leigh of Gonzalez and Leigh has taken the
> >> case.
> >> > His
> >> > > >>> > partner
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> was Ralph Nader's running mate. He'll be bringing in
> some
> >> > > "heavy
> >> > > >>> > > hitters,"
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> as he put it. Am still scheduled to speak to Stanley
> >> Cohen
> >> > > >>> tomorrow,
> >> > > >>> > > after
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> which I'll put the two in touch. The EFF had said
> they'd
> >> > > assist
> >> > > >>> once
> >> > > >>> > > we had
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> a confirmed name and have just let them know.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: "MICHAEL RILEY, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" <
> >> > > >>> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Date: 04 Feb 2011 15:15:35
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> To: <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Subject: Re: do you have a couple of minutes to chat
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Thx. I'll keep that off the record but will keep in
> touch
> >> as
> >> > > the
> >> > > >>> > date
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> gets closer.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> ---- Original Message ----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> At: 2/4/2011 15:11
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Yeah, will do. Also, off the record, although Anonymous
> >> as a
> >> > > >>> > movement
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> will
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> no doubt continue to some small extent with Yemen, the
> >> 11th
> >> > is
> >> > > >>> the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> anniversary of Iran's revolution and I'm in discussions
> >> with
> >> > > >>> both
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iranian
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> exiles and some of the more competent Anons about
> >> supplying
> >> > > >>> certain
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> tools to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Green folks ahead of that, and perhaps getting involved
> >> > > further.
> >> > > >>> Our
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> concern
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> is that Anonymous is not yet equipped to handle such a
> >> > > situation
> >> > > >>> as
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Iran,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> which obviously involves a lot of nuance and
> interference
> >> > from
> >> > > >>> all
> >> > > >>> > the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> great
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> powers and then some. Eritrea, meanwhile, is a police
> >> state
> >> > > with
> >> > > >>> a
> >> > > >>> > > large
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> expat presence in the city in which I'm currently
> living
> >> and
> >> > > >>> I've
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> managed to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> get in touch with the exile opposition, which is
> >> > enthusiastic
> >> > > >>> about
> >> > > >>> > > any
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> attempt. That, too, would be a secret op run out of
> >> Project
> >> > PM
> >> > > >>> until
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> such
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> time as our cover is blown, at which point Anonymous
> will
> >> be
> >> > > >>> thrown
> >> > > >>> > at
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> them.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> I expect those operations to begin in two weeks.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:06 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> NEWSROOM:
> >> > > >>> > <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Can u let me know what he says?
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > ---- Original Message ----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > At: 2/4/2011 15:03
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Just heard back from Doron; Jay Mafield will be the
> >> > > attorney.
> >> > > >>> Am
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> supposed
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > talk to Doron in a bit.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> >> BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> > NEWSROOM:
> >> > > >>> > > <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Working on the attorneys. If it doesn't go today it
> >> will
> >> > > go
> >> > > >>> on
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> monday.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > But
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > let me know if other reporters call and I'll try
> and
> >> > push
> >> > > >>> it.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Sent From Bloomberg Mobile MSG
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > ---- Original Message ----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > At: 2/4/2011 13:59
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Did you manage to get a hold of everyone? Haven't
> had
> >> > any
> >> > > >>> other
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> interview
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > requests since we spoke so you're good.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> >> > BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> > > NEWSROOM:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > will do. thanks you.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > At:  2/03 16:57:02
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Here, just call him - 917-544-5471. His other
> >> number,
> >> > > >>> possibly
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> cell, is
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 845-482-3119. Try first one first, I don't know
> if
> >> he
> >> > > >>> wants me
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> giving
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > out
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > second one but I'm sure he won't mind since I'm
> >> going
> >> > to
> >> > > >>> get
> >> > > >>> > him
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> paid
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > via
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > a
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > legal defense fund (off the record for now).
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> >> > > BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM: <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Hey, barrett. Will you do me a favor and check
> >> the
> >> > > >>> earthlink
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> address
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > for
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Stanley. I tried it and it came back 'user
> >> unknown.'
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Also trying heidi.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > thx
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > At:  2/03 13:50:29
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > No problem, will do.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, MICHAEL RILEY,
> >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> NEWSROOM:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Thanks, I appreciate it. If you give this to
> >> > anyone
> >> > > >>> else,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> could you
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > just
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > give me a heads up. That will give me an idea
> >> that
> >> > I
> >> > > >>> > should
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> move as
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > quickly
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > as possible. My preference is to spend a
> little
> >> > more
> >> > > >>> time
> >> > > >>> > > and
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> talk
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > lawyers about this whole thing.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > At:  2/03 13:47:54
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > You're the first today. Anyway I'll make sure
> >> you
> >> > > have
> >> > > >>> a
> >> > > >>> > > head
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > start.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:44 PM, MICHAEL
> RILEY,
> >> > > >>> BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > NEWSROOM:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > thanks, barrett. that's all a big help.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Can you tell me whether you've talked to
> >> other
> >> > > >>> reporters
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> about
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > this.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > I
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > have
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to run out to an interview and I'm just
> >> trying
> >> > to
> >> > > >>> figure
> >> > > >>> > > out
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> if I
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > have
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > a
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > little time to talk Stanley or Heidi.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Again, much appreciated.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > To: MICHAEL RILEY (BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > At:  2/03 13:33:26
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Michael-
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Good to meet you. Here's the info I have.
> Let
> >> me
> >> > > >>> know if
> >> > > >>> > I
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> forgot
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > anything.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Heidi Boghosian" <director@nlg.org>,
> >> (NAtional
> >> > > >>> Lawyers
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Guild
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > director
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > whom I'm working to choose lawyers)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Stanley Cohen stanleycohen@earthlink.net -
> >> guy
> >> > > who
> >> > > >>> guys
> >> > > >>> > > on
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Fox
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > defends
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Hamas, lol
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jan/27/anonymous-internet
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > -
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > my op-ed from other day, with links to info
> >> on
> >> > > >>> > OpTunisia,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> etc.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > As I mentioned, there are three people I'm
> >> > > assisting
> >> > > >>> in
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> this.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Trivette" is a channel operator of
> >> anonops.ru,
> >> > > >>> where a
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> large
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > faction
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Anonymous movement does its work. He's a
> >> > > California
> >> > > >>> male
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> whose
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > documents
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > have (partially, it seems). Here is the
> >> entirety
> >> > > of
> >> > > >>> what
> >> > > >>> > I
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> have;
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > if
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > other
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > info is needed from him, let me know and
> I'll
> >> > get
> >> > > it
> >> > > >>> > ASAP.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> The
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > relevant
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > grand jury starts on Feb 10.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Subpoena
> >> > > >>> > http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4348/sub2sw.jpg
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Attachment to federal grand jury subpoena:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/1708/subz.jpg
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Owen" controls the anonops.ru server. He
> >> was
> >> > > >>> raided by
> >> > > >>> > > the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> FBI
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > but
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > has
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > not
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > received any subpoena. He doesn't seem
> >> > interested
> >> > > in
> >> > > >>> any
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> legal
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > advice
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > until
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > such point as he is required to get off his
> >> ass
> >> > by
> >> > > >>> the
> >> > > >>> > > Feds.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > "Rabbit"/"No" is a 19-year-old Nevada
> female.
> >> > Her
> >> > > >>> family
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> home was
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > raided
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > and
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > she was questioned at that point. She
> >> actually
> >> > > >>> called
> >> > > >>> > > right
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> after
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > I
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > got
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > off
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with you and told me the following:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Equipment seized:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two broken laptops
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > two jump drives
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > father's laptop
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > mac book
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > samsung phone
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > iphone
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > router
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > The search warrant was shown to her only
> >> after
> >> > she
> >> > > >>> had
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> requested
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > see
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > it
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > several times and was questioned about
> >> > MasterCard
> >> > > >>> etc
> >> > > >>> > > (it's
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > looking
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > like
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > MIAA thing may just be peripheral or even
> >> > > unrelated,
> >> > > >>> as
> >> > > >>> > > I'm
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> just
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > now
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > able
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > determine). It's headlined United States
> >> > District
> >> > > >>> Court
> >> > > >>> > of
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Nevada.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > According
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to one section, it was supposed to be
> carried
> >> > out
> >> > > by
> >> > > >>> Feb
> >> > > >>> > 9
> >> > > >>> > > -
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> one
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > day
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > before
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the California grand jury goes down. She'll
> >> be
> >> > > able
> >> > > >>> to
> >> > > >>> > > scan
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> it
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > and
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > get
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > it
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > you or whoever ends up assisting by
> Thursday
> >> but
> >> > > >>> it's in
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > reference
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > her
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > having allegedly accessed a secure computer
> >> to
> >> > > >>> obtain
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > information,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 18
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > U.S.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > c
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 1030a2c.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Barrett
> >> Brown <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > barriticus@gmail.com
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Michael-
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Sure, give me a call at 512-560-2302
> >> whenever.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:52 AM, MICHAEL
> >> > RILEY,
> >> > > >>> > > BLOOMBERG/
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > NEWSROOM:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > <
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > michaelriley@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Hey, Barrett.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> I'm working on a story about the DoJ's
> >> > efforts
> >> > > to
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> prosecute
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > individuals
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> associated with Anonymous and the DDoS
> >> > attacks
> >> > > >>> > against
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> PayPal
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > and
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > others.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> The NYT mentioned that you're helping to
> >> > > organize
> >> > > >>> > legal
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > assistance
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > for
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> some of those arrested and released
> >> recently.
> >> > > Do
> >> > > >>> you
> >> > > >>> > > have
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> a
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > couple
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > of
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> minutes to talk. I'm interested in your
> >> sense
> >> > > of
> >> > > >>> what
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> DoJ's
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > strategy
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > is
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> here. Is this about making some examples
> >> from
> >> > a
> >> > > >>> few
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> people
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > associated
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > with
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Anonymous. Are they trying to go after
> >> > leaders
> >> > > in
> >> > > >>> the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> hopes of
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > beheading
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > the
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> group (which seems unlikely, give the
> >> > nature).
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> And I'm also just interested in what
> >> exactly
> >> > > >>> people
> >> > > >>> > are
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> being
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > charged
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> with. From a legal perspective, this is
> a
> >> > > tricky
> >> > > >>> move
> >> > > >>> > > on
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> their
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > part.
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Michael Riley
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> Washington bureau/Bloomberg News
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (202) 624 1982
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >> (720) 635 8553 (cell)
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> --
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>>> 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>> --
> >> > > >>> > > >>> Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>> Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >>> 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >> --
> >> > > >>> > > >> Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >> Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > >> 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >>
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > > --
> >> > > >>> > > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > > >
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > --
> >> > > >>> > > Regards,
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> > >
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > --
> >> > > >>> > Regards,
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> --
> >> > > >>> Regards,
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Barrett Brown
> >> > > >>> 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >> Regards,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Barrett Brown
> >> > > >> 512-560-2302
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Regards,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > > 512-560-2302
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Barrett Brown
> >> > > 512-560-2302
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Barrett Brown
> >> > 512-560-2302
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Barrett Brown
> >> 512-560-2302
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Barrett Brown
> > 512-560-2302
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302