On 1/4/11, Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sweetheart. I'm sorry about what's happened. You're not pestering me. Did
> Jess send you my message earlier?
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:12 PM,
emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <
>
emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just had a dream about you in which, for your next Guardian piece,
>> you outed yourself as the *criminal* mastermind behind Anonymous, who
>> singlehandedly took down Tunisia, after you became pissed off at them
>> when they tried to depose you in a daring but unsuccessful coup d'etat
>> against you as the most successful President of Columbia in all human
>> history. I woke thinking this could actually happen because you are
>> that sexy, being the Texan Julian Assange, only better looking etc,
>> and it would make for great copy so you would definitely do it, even
>> though you'd no longer be anonymous. I think you could get a face
>> transplant and your fingerprints replaced with new ones so you could
>> be Anonymous again and next time take down all Islamic states and
>> annihalate them totally like the vermin they are. As long as you get
>> the same face. I like that face. You could wear a false nose on
>> outings. I think about you all the time Barrett and wonder how you
>> are. I won't say it but you know I love you. Damn just said it.
>> A-gain. I love you Barrett, love Emma. God damnit what on earth is
>> wrong with me. Forgive this rather obvious attempt at levity in order
>> to make tentative contact with you because I feel your loss in my life
>> like a physical pain and I am so in love with you I cannot stop
>> punishing myself. I think in time I will be able to stop pestering you
>> but not yet. Your forbearance is greatly appreciated. My darling. My
>> love. My sweetheart. I adore you. From Emma. X now I'll debate with
>> myself whether to send this and spend the next ten minutes arguing
>> then I'll probably send it and feel immensely exposed and vulnerable.
>> I really did just dream that about you though. I went for a walk today
>> for 2 hours and passed by a house which had statues of eagles on its
>> gateposts. They looked, not to put too fine a point on it, ridiculous
>> and ostentaious. Which is a cardinal sin in conservative suburbia.
>> Rather like driving a Lexus or having gold taps. Eagles on gate posts
>> should only be conceived upon at the entrance to stately homes when
>> ones garden is the size of Surrey and ones relative made his riches
>> duelling and planning the overthrow of the Scots.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>