Subject: [The League of Ordinary Gentlemen] Comment: "Anonymous launches new project, press release"
From: Obdicut <erik.kain@gmail.com>
Date: 12/17/10, 18:28
To: barriticus@gmail.com
Reply-To:
"obdicut@gmail.com" <obdicut@gmail.com>

New comment on your post "Anonymous launches new project, press release"
Author : Obdicut (IP: 74.64.115.158 , cpe-74-64-115-158.nyc.res.rr.com)
E-mail : obdicut@gmail.com
URL    : 
Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=74.64.115.158
Comment: 
But how does that mean you get to say "We" about Anonymous?  That's what I don't get.  

First of all, most of Anonymous isn't involved in this struggle.  Most of Anonymous is posting random pron and lulz on \b\. 

Second of all, even if we restrict "Anonymous" to "the set of people engaged in actions related to Wikileaks", why do you think that you can represent Anonymous authoritatively?  

Your writing on this subject is noticeably different from on other topics.  Saying that states engage in worse behavior is an obvious tu quoque argument.  I never said that your actions were tantamount to a state-sponsored atrocity, so defending yourself against that charge is frankly bizarre.

Oh hey, Anonymous just posted the facebook profile and phone number of a young girl, with the message "Do your worst!"  Activism at its finest.

You can see all comments on this post here: 
http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/blog/2010/12/17/anonymous-launches-new-project-press-release/#comments

Trash it: http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=trash&c=88879
Spam it: http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=spam&c=88879