Subject: Re: Shadow Wednesday |
From: "emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com" <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> |
Date: 12/6/10, 15:55 |
To: Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com> |
CC: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>, dynamicuno@gmail.com, Sundeep Gottipati <gsundeep@gmail.com>, Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com>, Campbell Vertesi <campbell@vertesi.com> |
Despite being a Shadow, Shadow is a real person. Although if he/she was a bot, then I'd like to meet it's creator since that's one smart bot.On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:28 AM, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
Can someone tell me what this is about, I have forgotten everything. Is Shadow a real person or a *bot* whatever that is. Sorry, have the flu. But my dad is Tim Berners Lee so bow. xOn Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com> wrote:
Can someone refresh my memory on why the probationary period was rejected? Sorry but my memory sucks.On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
No, the changes appear to be fine. I've also made changes to the other document on specs to remove the portion regarding a probationary period for bloggers as per our conversation with Campbell and the others.--On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com> wrote:So I see Shadow has made some modifications to the Initial Release Spec document Sundeep created.
I didn't notice any gross changes so I assume the adjustments were both minor and benign.
Since I was curious who this Shadow Wednesday was I did some quick Googling and came the conclusion that Shadow is associated with Quebec's branch of Anonymous.
Barrett, I take it I need not concern myself with the changes?
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302