Subject: Fwd: Shadow Wednesday |
From: Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com> |
Date: 12/5/10, 11:11 |
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: Shadow Wednesday
To: Scott Mintz <
scott.w.mintz@gmail.com>
Cc: Barrett Brown <
barriticus@gmail.com>,
dynamicuno@gmail.com, Sundeep Gottipati <
gsundeep@gmail.com>, Clark Robinson <
robinsonchicago@gmail.com>, Campbell Vertesi <
campbell@vertesi.com>
Can someone tell me what this is about, I have forgotten everything. Is Shadow a real person or a *bot* whatever that is. Sorry, have the flu. But my dad is Tim Berners Lee so bow. x
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Scott Mintz
<scott.w.mintz@gmail.com> wrote:
Can someone refresh my memory on why the probationary period was rejected? Sorry but my memory sucks.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Barrett Brown
<barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
No, the changes appear to be fine. I've also made changes to the other document on specs to remove the portion regarding a probationary period for bloggers as per our conversation with Campbell and the others.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Scott Mintz
<scott.w.mintz@gmail.com> wrote:
So I see Shadow has made some modifications to the Initial Release Spec document Sundeep created.
I didn't notice any gross changes so I assume the adjustments were both minor and benign.
Since I was curious who this Shadow Wednesday was I did some quick Googling and came the conclusion that Shadow is associated with Quebec's branch of Anonymous.
Barrett, I take it I need not concern myself with the changes?
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302