Re: Jack
Subject: Re: Jack
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 11/30/10, 18:43
To: "emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com" <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>

I came across this novel last night and the portions I've read happened to consist largely of Jack London writing about a character that clearly reflects his own view of himself and a woman who reflects how he thinks women look at him. I am making fun of Jack London. I would have written the exact same thing had I not known you. The fact that you consider me to be what Jack London wanted to be did not influence anything I've written. I am astounded that after the way I've opened myself up to you you would accuse me of thinking or doing anything of the sort.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:37 PM, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
It's a convenient coincidence don't you think?

On 11/30/10, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't fucking think so. I'm always going on about how much you turn
> me on and such like and also about your blonde good looks and your all
> round cleverness, your brain, your attractiveness and your effect on
> me and then you write a piece about a blonde alpha male and a lustful
> female admirer and the rather obvious effect he has on this star
> struck sex started gagging for it nympho. And i'm supposed to think
> its not about me or how lame you think this all is? Like all I am is a
> fucking wet cunt for you.
>
> On 11/30/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What? This is not a dig at you, it is a dig at Jack London for writing
>> self-indulgent fan fiction about himself.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:22 PM, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <
>> emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is fictional but has pointed references and parallels to real life
>>> which you acknowledge here and must have known i'd recognise too, on
>>> reading it. Either you are having a dig at me or you are  unaware.
>>> Since you are plainly not unaware I must assume the latter. I suppose
>>> my 'leaking vagina' is a source of great amusement for you.
>>>
>>> On 11/30/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Yes, that occurred to me as I was writing it, but in that case it was
>>> > a
>>> > fictional case in which Jack London is basically praising himself, and
>>> > he
>>> > had nothing on me, of corse.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:48 PM, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <
>>> > emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> The blonde superman being lusted after by the 'leaking vagina' sounds
>>> >> very like me and my lust for you. You pig.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Barrett Brown
>>> > 512-560-2302
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Barrett Brown
>> 512-560-2302
>>
>



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302