Subject: Re: Jack |
From: "emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com" <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> |
Date: 11/30/10, 18:35 |
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
I don't fucking think so. I'm always going on about how much you turn
me on and such like and also about your blonde good looks and your all
round cleverness, your brain, your attractiveness and your effect on
me and then you write a piece about a blonde alpha male and a lustful
female admirer and the rather obvious effect he has on this star
struck sex started gagging for it nympho. And i'm supposed to think
its not about me or how lame you think this all is? Like all I am is a
fucking wet cunt for you.
On 11/30/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
What? This is not a dig at you, it is a dig at Jack London for writing
self-indulgent fan fiction about himself.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:22 PM, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <
emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
It is fictional but has pointed references and parallels to real life
which you acknowledge here and must have known i'd recognise too, on
reading it. Either you are having a dig at me or you are unaware.
Since you are plainly not unaware I must assume the latter. I suppose
my 'leaking vagina' is a source of great amusement for you.
On 11/30/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, that occurred to me as I was writing it, but in that case it was a
fictional case in which Jack London is basically praising himself, and
he
had nothing on me, of corse.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:48 PM, emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com <
emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
The blonde superman being lusted after by the 'leaking vagina' sounds
very like me and my lust for you. You pig.
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302