Subject: Re: Davis letter |
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
Date: 11/29/10, 13:37 |
To: Tim Rogers <timr@dmagazine.com> |
Again, here's the pertinent sentence: "But in the second part of the game, he applied as my 'answer' a paragraph from a column I'd written about something else." I didn't portray that as an "answer" to a question I asked him at all; I introduced it accurately as being from a previous Dallas Morning News column. Do you see what I mean?
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Tim Rogers
<timr@dmagazine.com> wrote:
The letter in the magazine makes plain that you asked Davis a question and he responded. Then you examined something he'd written. That's accurate, is it not?
But to answer your question: yes, you can respond. It'll have to be online, though.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Barrett Brown
<barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there any way I could have a response to Davis' letter ran in the next issue? As it is now, the letter has been run without any note explaining that his charge that I fraudulently ran something that wasn't actually his response to the question is entirely false, so anyone who reads the letters in this month issue will assume that I have lied to the entire readership and fraudulently tried to pass off something else as an answer to my question, and you've already explained to Davis his mistake.
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302
--
Tim Rogers
Editor
D Magazine
750 N. St. Paul St., Ste. 2100
Dallas, TX 75201
214-939-3636
www.dmagazine.com
--
Regards,
Barrett Brown
512-560-2302I g