Is there any way I could have a response to Davis' letter ran in the next issue? As it is now, the letter has been run without any note explaining that his charge that I fraudulently ran something that wasn't actually his response to the question is entirely false, so anyone who reads the letters in this month issue will assume that I have lied to the entire readership and fraudulently tried to pass off something else as an answer to my question, and you've already explained to Davis his mistake.