Re: I am now editor of the National Review.
Subject: Re: I am now editor of the National Review.
From: "emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com" <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>
Date: 11/9/10, 16:10
To: barriticus@gmail.com

wow I just watched that video of that woman.... Colleen and the Repltilians. Well I want proof. I want to see these Reptilian overlords. MI6 and the SS and the Nazi's! and the Pope and his red shoes. It all makes sense. If she can only get a few hundred thousand million more followers she can start a new religion and have *Colleen Law* banned in Oklahoma. 



On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
masturbating with one hand and typing with other, how prescient that my new favorite video became the Open letter to Rich Lowry right when this whole thing blew up. I am psychic. totally. fuck me you bastard


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:02 PM, barri2009 <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Check out the update

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

From: Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:04:12 +0000
To: Barrett Brown<barriticus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I am now editor of the National Review.

well thats because Rich Lowery wants your cock. You're one of the people that people take note of. And you have all these haters because you're someone to be reckoned with. Im going to masturbate then eat chocolate. I need oral satisfaction and I need to come. Like right now. 

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh my god, so to speak. National Review just linked to my post. Even after my update explaining that it's the wrong date. I almost wish I had this on purpose just to fuck everyone over. Anyway this gives me a good idea for my film treatment.


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
My friend just sent me this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJB2Woe5zeQ&feature=player_embedded


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
The relish with which it was pounced on and voted up points more to the fact that people are gleeful at the way in which information - sensitive information which we would hitherto never have been privy to, is now available, and with ever increasing ease. Even if the dates are out, that initial zest remains. Also, I want you to fuck my fucking brains out. I don't think I said that today yet. Even if I did, it bears repeating ad infinitum.


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
People from the Brookings Institution and Politico have also tweeted it without noticing the date discrepancy. I may have accidentally prompted an entirely different story about how no one checks dates.


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like nobody payed close attention: me, you, the guy who posted the notice and everyone else at Reddit who voted it up. 

Nobody would have noticed at all on the LOG website if you hadn't updated, I bet. Quick! Take it off. 


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
God damnit, the Notice to Airmen I posted is for tonight, not yesterday, and now all of these outlets are picking up my post because they're not paying any closer attention that I was. I guess I'll just sit back and watch the mayhem.


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
My new favourite video is "An open letter to National Review editor Rich Lowery."  

Last night I lay down, put my laptop on the other pillow and played it in the dark. I had to pretend to be Rich Lowery, but heck it was worth it. I had such a major hard on. 



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302