Re: First time

I want you to fuck me like this so much but I also want to have you in tender moments when I can get to your heart and feel love. So you can feel love too, I want to make love to you. I want us to have everything.

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

I'll fuck you against all sorts of things for hours at a time. Just to remind you, I can go for hours due to the opiates. You're going to get fucked to a degree you would have never imagined previously. I'm going to be inside of you for a large portion of each day. I'm going to make your tits my playground. I'm going to just come up and rub my cock against your tits apropos of nothing. I'm going to be entirely wanton. Particularly when I get drunk and lose all inhibitions and have a naked woman for whom I feel indefinable affection just sitting in my room for me to play with.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
Bravo. I'm glad you agree and will do something. It needs shaking up.
I read the whole comments section and not one entry grabbed my mind,
nothing resonated. Nobody made any good points or even seemed to know
what they were talking about. It's all so lame. So flaccid. The
structure of the debate needs firming up considerably. There is no
strength, no central thrust. Christ I just realised i'm talking in
sexual metaphors. I really need you to fuck me so hard up against that
wall.

On 11/5/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to be taking the debate in an entirely different direction for
> that very reason; all of these metaphysical attempts are nonsense.
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Emma Allan
> <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> No, its my fault. I can never co-ordinate my arousal with yours so it
>> seems
>> like I'm on my own with a huge need to have you. I've been reading the
>> comments and people are simply talking about nothing. God this, God that.
>> What does that even mean? It's not based on evidence or reality. It's all
>> supposition, opinion and blind faith. Some bloke called Kyle R Cupp saying
>> "God
>> doesnt foresee the unfolding of actions; he sees them in his eternal
>> present as they happen.
>>
>> There is also no instant before God created the universe because, as you
>> note, Space and Time are creations of God."
>>
>> How does he know this? What's he talking about? Doesn't it strike you as
>> ridiculous? I can't get into debates with theists because this is what it
>> ends up like. A lot of waffling about God being outside of time, all that
>> supernatural crap. Its fucking MADE UP. I could go in there pretending to
>> be
>> a Christian and just makes stuff up. Like they are.
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, was absorbed in writing my opening argument and following the
>>> comments so far.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Emma Allan
>>> <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Emotionally distant?
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/10, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > I want us. I want everything with you.
>>>> >
>>>> > On 11/5/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> That's the plan.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Emma Allan
>>>> >> <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> No foreplay. Just grab me, kiss me, lift me up against the wall and
>>>> >>> push your cock inside me.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Regards,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Barrett Brown
>>>> >> 512-560-2302
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Barrett Brown
>>> 512-560-2302
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>

--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302