Re: Project PM
Subject: Re: Project PM
From: Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>
Date: 11/3/10, 15:34
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>

yes okay. Im annoyed with people and having fights about fucking Islam again. 

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, good, we can also go to Shoreshireknightsbridgetonwickenham-on-the-Avonshirebridge and eat some steamed wheat over hog's spleen? 


On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Emma Allan <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com> wrote:
There is nothing bizarre or uncanny about our valleys I'll have you
know. Also british shit is not weird. It is lovely, quaint and
amusing. I'll take you to a beautiful place on Lake Windermere where
you will discover your soul and we'll swim naked and make love in the
barn. You can also fuck me from behind after we have the malt drink.
If we haven't fallen asleep of course. Ps love

On 11/3/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Plus it has all kinds of weird British shit on it, like claims that it will
> help you sleep. It's fucking malt. I've always known that if I ever go to
> England I will see all kinds of bizarre uncanny valley stuff and this
> confirms it.
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Emma Allan
> <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> You mean horlicks.
>>
>> On 11/3/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Horlet's.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Emma Allan
>> > <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> I demand to know the identity of the Malt stuff. Thank you.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Nevermind, I'm happy again. I am fucking with the editor of a fascist
>> >>> Catholic magazine who has decided to pick a fight.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2010/11/perhaps-we-should-hire-this-incompetent-fellow-who-hates-us/comment-page-1/#comment-78422
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Emma Allan
>> >>> <emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I don't know what the malt stuff is but you can def fuck me from
>> behind.
>> >>>> Maybe it's something the Queen has. Ooh ooh, I just thought is it a
>> malt
>> >>>> drink? Is it called Horlicks? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horlicks
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If it is that then I LOVE IT. (not as much as you, but pretty close)
>> >>>> Also
>> >>>> this totally turned me on. (the last sentence regarding the fucking)
>> We
>> >>>> haven't talked of that for ooooh, at least a few days, and it kinda
>> took
>> >>>> me
>> >>>> by surprise, so to speak. Fuck fuck fucking. Fuck Emma into next
>> >>>> week.
>> >>>> oh
>> >>>> God Im so horny. Stop it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> DON'T STOP
>> >>>>
>> >>>> love you x
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Barrett Brown
>> >>>> <barriticus@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> You're adorable. Also, my mom just brought over a blender and some
>> malt
>> >>>>> stuff that they apparently use in England, coincidentally enough, so
>> I
>> >>>>> can
>> >>>>> make you, like, English malts. And then fuck you from behind.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Emma Allan <
>> emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com
>> >>>>> > wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> thank you, I love those IRC chats - its where I first realised I
>> >>>>>> wanted
>> >>>>>> to get to know you much better. Also where I realised I had to get
>> my
>> >>>>>> emotions in check because all I did was insult you and I didn't
>> >>>>>> mean
>> >>>>>> to. It
>> >>>>>> was like I developed Tourettes as soon as I went on the channel.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I would write something sarcastic or rude to you and think *OMG
>> >>>>>> Emma
>> >>>>>> wtf are you doing, he's really nice and you're being such a wanker
>> >>>>>> toward
>> >>>>>> him.* Then I'd do it again and think *fucking hell get offline
>> before
>> >>>>>> he
>> >>>>>> totally hates you* I was a menace to myself. Luckily Im much calmer
>> >>>>>> now. :)
>> >>>>>> (although highly sexually aroused and will have to stop myself
>> writing
>> >>>>>> *Oh
>> >>>>>> Barrett I LOVE YOU GIVE ME A BABY*) (JOKE!) I do not want a baby.
>> >>>>>> Oh
>> >>>>>> GOD why
>> >>>>>> am I talking about babies. Kill me now. I am stupid.
>> >>>>>> ps love you x
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Barrett Brown
>> >>>>>> <barriticus@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> We've got an IRC meeting tomorrow as usual on Wednesdays, although
>> >>>>>>> we'll be joined by this woman who's involved in helping NGOs
>> >>>>>>> better
>> >>>>>>> coordinate their work; below is a discussion that Scott Mintz had
>> >>>>>>> with her
>> >>>>>>> over the last couple of days.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>>>> From: Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> Date: Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM
>> >>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Project PM
>> >>>>>>> To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>, Clark Robinson <
>> >>>>>>> robinsonchicago@gmail.com>, dynamicuno@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Since I doubt I'll be unable to make tomorrow's meeting, I thought
>> it
>> >>>>>>> wise to pass along the below email exchange between myself and the
>> >>>>>>> owner of
>> >>>>>>> http://nonprofitawareness.blogspot.com/. While her goals may not
>> >>>>>>> perfectly aligned with Project PM in the blogging sense her focus
>> on
>> >>>>>>> charitable acts and the dissemination of accurate information is
>> >>>>>>> certainly a
>> >>>>>>> fit. I think she has a lot to offer!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>>>> From: Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> Date: Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM
>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Project PM
>> >>>>>>> To: Courtney Brickman <court418@comcast.net>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Courtney,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I appreciate your valid concerns. With regards to your suggestion,
>> we
>> >>>>>>> have a PDF undergoing creation which is intended to meet the tasks
>> of
>> >>>>>>> identifying goals, strategies, and critical issues.It is something
>> we
>> >>>>>>> are
>> >>>>>>> currently working on and expect its finalization will be
>> instrumental
>> >>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>> paving the way for proper software creation/implementation as well
>> as
>> >>>>>>> our
>> >>>>>>> marketing efforts. I don't remember if this particular document is
>> >>>>>>> part of
>> >>>>>>> our shared Google docs, or if it was simply being emailed around.
>> >>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>> will
>> >>>>>>> check when I get home, but for the former, it may be necessary for
>> >>>>>>> you to
>> >>>>>>> have a Google account in order to view and participate.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> As our network of participants grows, so do our connections and
>> vast
>> >>>>>>> pool of experiences and expertise. While I personally have no
>> >>>>>>> clear
>> >>>>>>> cut
>> >>>>>>> answer for you how the Project PM software will directly benefit
>> our
>> >>>>>>> anticipated charitable undertakings, it is my belief that we'll be
>> >>>>>>> utilizing
>> >>>>>>> the infrastructure we put in place that allows for the efficient
>> >>>>>>> connection
>> >>>>>>> and communication among many knowledgeable individuals. Without a
>> >>>>>>> doubt this
>> >>>>>>> is something that should not be neglected in order to best
>> >>>>>>> maximize
>> >>>>>>> our
>> >>>>>>> efforts, and I will raise this question to Barrett Brown shortly
>> >>>>>>> as
>> >>>>>>> it's
>> >>>>>>> very possible he already has an answer.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Scott
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Courtney Brickman <
>> >>>>>>> court418@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>  Scott,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for getting back to me. I certainly plan to attend the
>> >>>>>>>> meeting tomorrow evening. I’m still having a little trouble
>> >>>>>>>> envisioning what
>> >>>>>>>> Project PM’s structure looks like, but I’m getting there.  If I
>> >>>>>>>> could make
>> >>>>>>>> one suggestion, which I think would help bring others on board
>> more
>> >>>>>>>> quickly,
>> >>>>>>>> I think the project would really benefit from a document
>> identifying
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> critical issues Project PM will address, goals of the
>> organization,
>> >>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>> finally  the strategies you’ll implement to achieve those goals
>> (and
>> >>>>>>>> ultimately eliminating the issues). It just feels that with all
>> the
>> >>>>>>>> planning
>> >>>>>>>> and  brainstorming things have gotten a little fuzzy. I have no
>> >>>>>>>> doubt that
>> >>>>>>>> you all know exactly what you are aiming for, so it’s just about
>> >>>>>>>> conveying
>> >>>>>>>> that to others.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I guess the one area I’m still confused about is the connection
>> >>>>>>>> between the articles and the project’s charitable involvement.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Courtney
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Scott Mintz [mailto:scott.w.mintz@gmail.com]
>> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:43 PM
>> >>>>>>>> *To:* Courtney Brickman
>> >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Project PM
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Courtney,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> It is fair to say that the project does aim to correct erroneous
>> >>>>>>>> information being passed along to the masses, the intent of which
>> is
>> >>>>>>>> to best
>> >>>>>>>> educate the individual. It don't think it would be accurate to
>> >>>>>>>> say
>> >>>>>>>> that its
>> >>>>>>>> focus is on critical humanitarian issues, however, it is worth
>> >>>>>>>> mentioning
>> >>>>>>>> that the nature and personalities of those involved have resulted
>> in
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> previously mentioned two subproject.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I definitely agree that Project PM could be leveraged as a
>> >>>>>>>> funding
>> >>>>>>>> vehicle for various charitable organization, but I think it's
>> >>>>>>>> important that
>> >>>>>>>> for the time being we square away our own financial requirements
>> >>>>>>>> before we
>> >>>>>>>> can start pursuing the needs of others.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> We are still in the planning state, although we're very eager and
>> >>>>>>>> capable of beginning implementation once planning is complete.
>> >>>>>>>> One
>> >>>>>>>> thing
>> >>>>>>>> that you touched on is a major topic of discussion, which is to
>> say
>> >>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>> we're concerned about the accuracy and quality of distributed
>> >>>>>>>> information.
>> >>>>>>>> As I proceed to describe our current philosophy, please note that
>> it
>> >>>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>> subject to change and that we're open to ideas. Currently,
>> >>>>>>>> participating
>> >>>>>>>> bloggers are being hand-chosen based on what we perceive to be
>> >>>>>>>> open-mindedness and journalistic integrity.  These bloggers will
>> in
>> >>>>>>>> turn
>> >>>>>>>> invite a limited amount other bloggers whose works they will
>> >>>>>>>> temporarily
>> >>>>>>>> attached to, and the system will grow that way. In order to
>> >>>>>>>> filter
>> >>>>>>>> out lower
>> >>>>>>>> quality articles we plan to implement two safeguards. The first
>> >>>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>> that an
>> >>>>>>>> article pushed to someone in your network has the
>> >>>>>>>> ability/decision
>> >>>>>>>> to push
>> >>>>>>>> it to his/her network or stop the article in its path. The second
>> >>>>>>>> system is
>> >>>>>>>> static based and relates to number of pushes, posts, etc. The
>> >>>>>>>> goal
>> >>>>>>>> is to
>> >>>>>>>> make higher quality article of highly quality contributors more
>> >>>>>>>> readily
>> >>>>>>>> accessible to the public. Admittedly, these procedures are in
>> heavy
>> >>>>>>>> discussion as we recognize that correctly sorting this out is
>> >>>>>>>> critical to
>> >>>>>>>> Project PM's success.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> It would be great and helpful to Project PM to have you
>> participate
>> >>>>>>>> in more advanced discussions. As previously mentioned, we
>> generally
>> >>>>>>>> hold an
>> >>>>>>>> informal meeting on Wednesdays at 6:30PM EST over IRC. This
>> >>>>>>>> particular week
>> >>>>>>>> I don't think I'm going to be able to make it due to prior
>> >>>>>>>> arrangements, but
>> >>>>>>>> I encourage you to attend. You may also visit the IRC at any
>> >>>>>>>> time,
>> >>>>>>>> as there
>> >>>>>>>> is a good shot someone of various talent will be in the room.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Scott
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Courtney Brickman <
>> >>>>>>>> court418@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Scott,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Hope you had a nice weekend. Thank you for sending more
>> >>>>>>>> background
>> >>>>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>> Project PM.  Just to be clear, the project aims to discredit
>> >>>>>>>> erroneous media
>> >>>>>>>> reporting by publicizing the real story, and this is focused on
>> >>>>>>>> critical
>> >>>>>>>> humanitarian issues? From what you described, I could see Project
>> PM
>> >>>>>>>> as a
>> >>>>>>>> funding vehicle for organizations whose work falls within Project
>> >>>>>>>> PM’s
>> >>>>>>>> priorities. Especially if you are looking to connect with
>> charities.
>> >>>>>>>> What is
>> >>>>>>>> the current state of the project? Are you just in the planning
>> phase
>> >>>>>>>> or have
>> >>>>>>>> you begun to implement strategies?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> My  interest and experience focuses on strategic planning,
>> >>>>>>>> program
>> >>>>>>>> evaluation, and infrastructure development. That is primary the
>> area
>> >>>>>>>> I’ve
>> >>>>>>>> solicited funds for. So certainly I’d be interested in
>> participating
>> >>>>>>>> in a
>> >>>>>>>> capacity that would assist Project PM in those areas.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The only thing I’d like a little more clarification on is the
>> >>>>>>>> distribution of information and how the information is being
>> >>>>>>>> acquired and
>> >>>>>>>> presented. I agree, a lot of the problems with Digg, etc is that
>> >>>>>>>> when
>> >>>>>>>> everyone has an opportunity to contribute the creditability and
>> >>>>>>>> accuracy of
>> >>>>>>>> the information is compromised. I’m just wondering how you will
>> >>>>>>>> ensure that
>> >>>>>>>> the information presented is accurate and objective?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Courtney
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Scott Mintz [mailto:scott.w.mintz@gmail.com]
>> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 01, 2010 4:39 AM
>> >>>>>>>> *To:* Courtney Brickman
>> >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Project PM
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Courtney,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Happy Halloween!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I just wanted to give you a better idea of Project PM; its goals,
>> >>>>>>>> current state, and anticipated progress.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> As previously mentioned, Project PM’s goals are multifaceted but
>> the
>> >>>>>>>> overriding subject matter is the removal of informational
>> >>>>>>>> asymmetries with
>> >>>>>>>> the intention is improving society as a whole. For example, some
>> of
>> >>>>>>>> our
>> >>>>>>>> existing participants have hands-on experience doing
>> >>>>>>>> philanthropic
>> >>>>>>>> work in
>> >>>>>>>> Africa. Suggestions for improvement include but are not limited
>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>> efficient
>> >>>>>>>> means of bringing drinkable water to isolated villages and ways
>> >>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>> increasing the usage of sustainable farming in order to prevent
>> the
>> >>>>>>>> over
>> >>>>>>>> fishing of local waters, etc. Ultimately we’d like to achieve
>> these
>> >>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>> other goals using as little capital as possible while not
>> >>>>>>>> obstructing
>> >>>>>>>> success. However, at this point, this subproject is in the
>> formative
>> >>>>>>>> stage
>> >>>>>>>> as we’ve just started discussions with individuals who are best
>> >>>>>>>> in
>> a
>> >>>>>>>> position to allow us to see it through.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Another subproject that is in the formative stage but that we’ve
>> >>>>>>>> made
>> >>>>>>>> more headway on is what we call the Science/Journalism project.
>> >>>>>>>> Essentially,
>> >>>>>>>> we feel there is a lot of misinformation spread by mass media
>> >>>>>>>> when
>> >>>>>>>> it comes
>> >>>>>>>> to topics such as science and technology. We’ve established a
>> group
>> >>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>> knowledgeable persons whom we will be pairing with eager
>> >>>>>>>> freelance
>> >>>>>>>> journalists. Using our various participants’ contacts we will be
>> >>>>>>>> aiding in
>> >>>>>>>> the publication of articles written by the journalists in
>> >>>>>>>> cooperating with
>> >>>>>>>> the scientists we’ve chosen, whom so far range from those
>> >>>>>>>> educated
>> >>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>> neurology to those educated in virology.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> These and future subprojects will be executed using a technology
>> >>>>>>>> currently under design. We have more than a handful of computer
>> >>>>>>>> programmers
>> >>>>>>>> who are ready and willing to volunteer their time once we come up
>> >>>>>>>> with a
>> >>>>>>>> finalized blueprint. On an almost daily basis, a core group of us
>> >>>>>>>> are
>> >>>>>>>> debating the current schematics and updating as necessary. While
>> the
>> >>>>>>>> specifics still need to be determined the general theme of the
>> >>>>>>>> software will
>> >>>>>>>> be that feedback mechanisms will be used in order to make more
>> >>>>>>>> highly
>> >>>>>>>> recommended information rise to the top. This is similar to
>> Reddit,
>> >>>>>>>> Digg,
>> >>>>>>>> etc., however in our system, although the public will have access
>> to
>> >>>>>>>> all
>> >>>>>>>> information, only the feedback of participating members will have
>> an
>> >>>>>>>> impact
>> >>>>>>>> on the information’s publicity.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> To help us reach these ends, a group of about 10 of us
>> participating
>> >>>>>>>> in daily/weekly conversations via email/IRC/Gchat. This is an
>> >>>>>>>> extremely
>> >>>>>>>> informal process but with a great group of people who are more
>> than
>> >>>>>>>> willing
>> >>>>>>>> to work together harmoniously in order to advance Project PM.
>>  Here
>> >>>>>>>> is a
>> >>>>>>>> major area where I think your experience and expertise would be
>> >>>>>>>> particularly
>> >>>>>>>> useful. As Project PM grows and begins to take on a life of its
>> own,
>> >>>>>>>> it’s
>> >>>>>>>> important for it to be molded properly, and I expect your advice
>> >>>>>>>> would be
>> >>>>>>>> useful in guiding its success.  Even if you don’t have the time
>> >>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>> commit,
>> >>>>>>>> any suggestions and discussions would be appreciated.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Finally, as the number of subprojects Project PM undertakes
>> expands,
>> >>>>>>>> we expect that rather than taking on a challenge ourselves, it
>> would
>> >>>>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>>> wiser to work with those who have already done so and have
>> >>>>>>>> experience in
>> >>>>>>>> helping out others. Your network of charities would be an
>> invaluable
>> >>>>>>>> resource.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I hope this helps to add some additional color. Kindly feel free
>> to
>> >>>>>>>> ask me any questions you may have.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Scott
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Barrett Brown
>> >>>>>>> 512-560-2302
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Barrett Brown
>> >>>>> 512-560-2302
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Barrett Brown
>> >>> 512-560-2302
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Barrett Brown
>> > 512-560-2302
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Barrett Brown
> 512-560-2302
>



--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
512-560-2302