Subject: [The League of Ordinary Gentlemen] Comment: "Mark Davis, Ronald Reagan, and trick questions" |
From: blendwir@box300.bluehost.com |
Date: 10/21/10, 17:13 |
To: barriticus@gmail.com |
"robertcheeks@core.com" <robertcheeks@core.com> |
New comment on your post "Mark Davis, Ronald Reagan, and trick questions"
Author : Robert Cheeks (IP: 69.95.196.43 , ppp43.pm3-4.pakr-ch.pa.localnet.com)
E-mail : robertcheeks@core.com
URL :
Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=69.95.196.43
Comment:
<a href="#comment-76540" rel="nofollow">@Barrett Brown</a>, Thanks Barrett, I actually agree with your premise so I'm neither 'ignorant' nor do I have 'emotional needs' along that direction...however, I may be stupid about other stuff and my 'emotional needs' may drift along other directions.
My hyperbolic 'criticisms' are always directed at those 'libruls' who, presumably, have the intelligence to know better and the where-with-all to resist the so-called 'immanent salvation of man and society.' Those intellectual (academic?) leaders who may have some idea that there's a gnostic component in their statist faith that is grounded on the 'rise and fall of Soviet Communism' and potentially understood by them as a 'common failure of modernity', a failure that is shared by the West.
Consequently, we can not bring the 'intellectual librul' to Jesus until we make him see that his philosophy is merely a 'crisis of meaning,' grounded on the corruption of the spirit. Like Dylan said, "It's an empty, hungry feelin' that don't mean no one no good."
I'm not really interested in the unwashed, mass of 'libruls.'
You can see all comments on this post here:
http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2010/10/mark-davis-ronald-reagan-and-trick-questions/#comments
Trash it: http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=trash&c=76557
Spam it: http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=spam&c=76557