Subject: RE: Needs to be posted on ETV
From: "Peter Nuhn" <peter@nwseo.org>
Date: 9/10/10, 11:24
To: <elljhns8@aol.com>, <p.nuhn@verizon.net>, <stephengladney@gmail.com>, <djparker10@gmail.com>, <barriticus@gmail.com>
Reply-To:
<peter@nwseo.org>

This is not about supporting or not supporting the “scientific-minded” It is about how failure to recognize our enemies who support religious arguments over reality based analysis will put us behind the rest of the reality based world. Of course we only support Atheist candidates or those who support the civil rights of Atheists. That is not even a question here. The goal here is to provide our community with a motivation to get involved.

 

Peter

 

From: elljhns8@aol.com [mailto:elljhns8@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:09 AM
To: p.nuhn@verizon.net; stephengladney@gmail.com; djparker10@gmail.com; barriticus@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Needs to be posted on ETV

 

   We support candidates who defend the Establishment Clause and the civil rights of Atheists.  Are we going to support candidates who are "scientific-minded" people?  Should this be a criteria for EV? 

   What if a candidate is "scientific" but does not support the Establishment Clause or the civil rights of Atheists?  It's a possibility.  

 

Ellen

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: P Nuhn <p.nuhn@verizon.net>
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>; Dave Parker <djparker10@gmail.com>; Ellen Johnson <EllJhns8@aol.com>; Stephen Gladney <stephengladney@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Sep 10, 2010 9:19 am
Subject: Needs to be posted on ETV

Please read, very important for the reality based community.

 

SPA2