Subject: Re: HFC, p. 68 -- typo or irony too complex to follow? |
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
Date: 7/13/10, 20:22 |
To: Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Clark Robinson
<robinsonchicago@gmail.com> wrote:
As The Reader will no doubt have determined at this point,
the Dobson Theorem or whatever it is that weve decided to call
it is obviously bunk, since it stated that countries which allow
gay civil unions will see a decline in the marriage rate among
homosexuals, when in fact the opposite is true. But since weve
already gone to the trouble of expressing Dobsons goofy utterances
in the form of a theorem (or rather, since Ive gone to the
troubleyou were no help at all), we might as well punch in
these figures just to make absolutely sure:
Should this read 'heterosexuals' ?