Re: [Project PM Workshop] New comment on Taking this Blog Public.
Subject: Re: [Project PM Workshop] New comment on Taking this Blog Public.
From: Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com>
Date: 6/26/10, 21:21
To: Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com>
CC: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>

I can see Jeremy's point about stuff being re-posted elsewhere, out of context; but I also see good reasons for being open about everything we do.  As far as I'm concerned, it's up to Barrett.

Before we take it back private, if that is the decision, we probably should post the issue, again, for discussion by readers other than Jeremy.

It has been open to the pubic since June 14.

Even as it stands, I could not tell you who all the people signed on as authors really are.




On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Scott Mintz <scott.w.mintz@gmail.com> wrote:
How do you guys want to handle this? Options include making private, making it so the blog isn't indexed by search engines (I think), or also, Mr. Sapienza can make it so his name is under a pseudonym.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jeremy Sapienza <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:27 AM
Subject: [Project PM Workshop] New comment on Taking this Blog Public.
To: scott.w.mintz@gmail.com


Jeremy Sapienza has left a new comment on your post "Taking this Blog Public":

Actually I think it's rather important for it to be private. Some of us have people who look us up and especially in the case of Barrett, they hate our guts. I think this info is sensitive and potentially in the future undermining of certain societal structures and could attract loser trolls to comment and disseminate without context in order to make fun of it. I think it should be kept private.



Posted by Jeremy Sapienza to Project PM Workshop at Saturday, June 26, 2010 8:27:00 AM EDT