Re: Fw: Re: Project PM Update
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Project PM Update
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 5/17/10, 10:02
To: Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com>

Clark-

Great, go ahead and implement any ideas she has on that. Having updates at the top would also be very useful, providing a way by which participants can see what decisions/tasks are under discussion and need to be pursued at a given moment.

At any rate, we may be using Google Docs for collaboration even after our software is created, so it would be great if you and her could devise a protocol by which to efficiently run such docs in order to maximize participation and organization; participants would be more inclined to jump in and contribute if it was a bit clearer where and how they should do so, and as we add on members, the doc is going to get even ore cluttered. 

Also, anything you two come up with could have wider applications in other of our collaborative operations, as you'll be trying to answer broad questions regarding how best to prioritize information, among other things.

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, Barrett

I have been thinking the same thing about the collaborative document, and I have been entertaining ideas such as a daily (or couple times weekly) update summary by me at the top of the document, adding in bigger & bolder headings to encourage contributors to put related material together, and going through and adding labels/tags to make it easier to find stuff.  I am reluctant to rearrange items, since that would reduce readers' ability to appreciate the logic of the collaboration.

However, this all seems laborious and last-century, so:

Sometime this week, I am going to share the document with a friend, Jasmin Phua. I worked with Jas in the past designing web-based systems (I was the technoingenuous model user; she was the designer) and hope she is not too busy to give me guidance on how to apply automated tools to this collaborative document.


Clark Robinson
217-722-8680


On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Clark-

Great, thanks for stepping up on this. A couple things:

1. Campbell Vertesi has been added to the Africa project, along with Felipe Farley. Vertesi has experience in such projects and Farley is a patent lawyer who has some great ideas regarding how we could identify old mechanical/light industrial technology that could be of benefit to villagers with limited resources and prior knowledge; I just spoke to him via phone, and we can definitely depend on him to contribute quite a bit in that regard. We'll need to figure out the best method of distributing such information; at the very least, we could compile an online guide that describes a variety of such instructions regarding mechanics as well as agriculture and whatever else would be useful; this would cost nothing and could be accessed with some benefit by those Africans with some degree of internet access. Of course, we'll want to figure out a means of distributing such info to those without net access, possibly by partnering with local entities that could print out such info and distribute it as necessary. Another method would be to contact African papers and offer them a regular how-to column with concise instructions on various techs. At any rate, we should keep looking into water and microloans, while at the same time the spreading of implementable technological knowledge and other applicable forms of education should be a major emphasis. 

2. We probably need to figure out a slightly more organized way of running this shared document and others that we'll be setting up soon, although it might not be necessary; give it some thought based on how things proceed this week now that we have more contributors working on this doc together. Also, think about whether it would be good to have other administrative rolls in the context of such sub-projects at these.

3. Eventually, if you think it's the best way to operate, we'll replace you as project head with somebody with more direct experience in philanthropy or developing world aid programs or both; by then, we'll hopefully have the ball rolling on getting our trust or whatever set up so that we won't have to concentrate on legalities and all of that. Meanwhile, feel free to delegate, appoint someone to run certain aspects, or whatever else. Mintz would be good as money man, Farley could be in charge of technology application, etc. Or, we could refrain from adding any more formal officerships until such time as we deem it necessary or desirable; give that some thought, too, and also remember that what we observe and experiment on in this case might provide us with insight into the questions we'll need to decide on with regards to the specific structure of the governing net as well as whatever additional sub-programs we initiate along the lines of Africa Development.

4. I don't believe Mintz blogs, but he certainly does have a great deal to offer by way of his analysis as well as his knowledge, and will be even more useful when it comes time to decide how best to manage whatever donations we bring in for the purpose. I spoke to him at length the other day, too, and he's had some good ideas on other, more fundamental aspects of PM as well.

Think that's it for now, I think. Let me know when you have more questions.

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@gmail.com> wrote:
Good morning, Barrett,

I will be glad to be the interim director for this, understanding that I'll be replaced when someone with appropriate background shows up.
 
In addition, this means that you will get e-mails from me asking for your thoughts on project issues, outside the collaborative document, so that I understand your concepts.  This comes from watching design and implementation of processing and analytical systems in a large organization, which taught me that the risk of adding other people's ideas to a good concept is a too-complicated and less-usable system.

Your statements below about what the interim director does (articulate agenda, define tasks, ask for volunteers) make sense to me.  I would add: continuously nudge the agenda forward.

By the way I am impressed by Scott Mintz's writing and analytical gifts.  Does he blog?

More to come in next few days,

Clark Robinson
217 722-8680







---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 9:19 AM
Subject: Fw: Re: Project PM Update
To: robinsonchicago@gmail.com




--- On Sat, 5/15/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Project PM Update
To: "Clark Robinson" <robinsonchicago@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 7:51 PM

Clark-

Just wanted to say thanks again for the initiative you've taken on the Africa Development Program in particular. I was thinking of putting someone in charge of each such sub-program until the governing network can take over. Being "in charge" in this case would basically involve identifying questions that need to answered, delegating tasks (at least by way of noting what tasks need to be completed and asking for participants with relevant skills to volunteer for them), and otherwise just making sure that everything goes smoothly. Do you think that's the best approach at this point, perhaps if we keep the leadership largely hands-off and make such a role basically involved steering the agenda without causing undue red tape or otherwise stifling the flow of collaboration? If so, would you be interested in serving as the director of the Africa sub-program either until such time as we can bring on someone with a more relevant background or until the governing network takes over? Let me know what you think, both regarding the concept and you serving in such a role. We'll try to hammer out the best approach to these sorts of questions with our "constitutional convention."

Meanwhile, Mintz has brought on a friend of his who serves as editor of a business journal and who says he'll give us a mention later this summer, and I'm talking this weekend to a couple of other folks whom I think will be especially useful.


On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Clark Robinson <robinsonchicago@yahoo.com> wrote:
Count me in, of course.

Clark Robinson
robinsonchicago@gmail.com
217-722-8680


--- On Sat, 5/15/10, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Subject: Project PM Update

To: "Barrett Brown" <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 2:18 PM


Howdy-

You are receiving this e-mail update because you have either expressed interest in Project PM at some point or have already joined up outright. 

I wanted to bring everyone up to speed on how Project PM has advanced in the three months or so since it was first announced, at which point we had only a vague idea of how to proceed and "we" consisted only of myself and a couple of associates. Today, we have what I and many others have determined to be a viable and comprehensive plan for bringing about some level of fundamental change in information flow while also creating an unprecedented entity designed to grow perpetually and to adopt and implement new tasks, all while retaining a high average level of participant competence without the need for human intervention. Meanwhile, "we" now consists of about 75 individuals with a remarkable range of skill sets and a common willingness to take responsibility for the changes we would like to see. 

I've had a chance to speak at some length to only a handful of you thus far, but would like to again express my gratitude to everyone for their interest. I particularly appreciate the efforts of those of you who have already begun to contribute ideas, ask necessary questions, and even to take some initiative in our early tasks, which we are currently approaching in a somewhat informal manner but which we will soon enough be able to pursue with the help of our network schematic and the open-source software being developed by our lead programmer Andrew Stein. When the software is completed, we will be ready to launch in earnest, most likely in August or thereabouts.

Here's a brief rundown of what's going on in the meantime and how you can contribute as we continue to gear up. Remember that I am always available for questions or discussions, either by phone (512-560-2302) or e-mail. 

1. We have initiated our first sub-project, the Africa Development Program, which will consist of a charitable entity (we're still deciding soon what legal form this will take) intent on raising and administering funds for the purpose of instigating various sustainable development programs on the village level; these efforts will include water purification, education, and financial assistance such as microloans. Aside from the overt benefits to the villages in question, the purpose of this early program is to serve as an experiment and demonstration regarding the efficiency of online collaborative networks in general and Project PM in particular. Currently we are using the latest version of shared Google Docs for the bulk of our work on this as our network, as noted above, will not come into play until launch, and thus what we hope to ascertain for ourselves and demonstrate to potential participants and supporters is the extent to which our distributed, collaborative approach to various tasks is superior to the approach taken by more orthodox institutions of the sort that have not been designed to take great advantage of the information age. To put it another way, we hope to show that, in terms of dollars spent to benefits accrued, our particular approach and our particular membership is better-equipped to address such a task as philanthropy than are, say, most philanthropists or organizations - and this, in turn, is intended to demonstrate our viability in terms of other tasks, including our central efforts with regards to media reform. At the same time, I'm observing the specific manner by which our participants are proceeding in order to get a better sense of how we ought to approach certain yet-to-be-determined aspects of our governing network. If you think you may be able to assist us in setting up and overseeing this particular sub-project, or if you'd simply like to see how the process is working thus far, let me know and I will invite you to the collaborative document that we are using as a sort of virtual base of operations.

2. We will soon be setting up our second collaborative document for the purpose of deciding the aforementioned questions that remain regarding the governing network, which is to say we are holding a constitutional convention of sorts. Although the basics of this network will be similar to that of our media network as detailed in the Project PM page on True/Slant, several important aspects remain to be determined. I've been discussing this with a few of our participants over the last couple months, and the document will include summaries of these exchanges in order to give everyone a sense of our thinking thus far as well as to prompt new suggestions. Based on what's been discussed thus far, I believe that we'll be able to come to a consensus on the details and end up with a particular schematic/blueprint under which this governing network will operate with the same superior efficiency that we expect to see from the media network, which itself is almost entirely defined at this point. Again, let me know if you would like access to this document when it goes up so that you may participate in the proceedings (which will be necessarily informal) or even if you'd just like to observe; we have a number of very clever and erudite people involved in these discussions, so the process should be just as interesting as it will be unprecedented.

3. I'm preparing the Project PM manifesto, which will appear either on Vanity Fair's website or some other outlet in addition to True/Slant and Huffington Post; this will be followed over the summer by a few other texts covering various fundamental aspects of Project PM and those dynamics that make it both possible and necessary. I'm also working on a FAQ that may be of interest to those of our participants with whom I haven't had a chance to speak.

4. If you know of anyone who might be interested in participating, please let them know about the project and have them contact me. I'd like to have a couple dozen more people with random skill sets so that, whatever form it takes, our governing network will be able to draw upon an even greater pool of knowledge and experience in the course of advancing Project PM.

5. Also, even if we've spoken already, please send me an e-mail confirming that you are willing to serve as a member of the governing network, which itself will be the driving entity behind Project PM as a whole and which will take over from myself in most respects at some point after launch. As I've noted, participation does not entail any time commitment at all; the network is designed in such a way as that it won't suffer by virtue of some members being inactive (other than that we won't benefit from your ideas and judgement). 

There have been a number of other scattered developments on various fronts, and I'll start providing regular updates soon by way of a Twitter feed or some such. I'll also be setting up a subreddit in order to provide another means of general discussions on the part of our members until such time as we have our software and thus can begin interfacing with one another in the improved manner on which Project PM is to be based. For now, I'd like to once again express my thanks to everyone who has gotten involved thus far. Again, please e-mail me at your earliest convenience and confirm that you would like to be involved in the governing network; if you'd prefer not to do so, you can still participate in a more informal sense to whatever extent you'd like, but the joining network will make it a great deal simpler for us to make sure that all suggestions and concerns are wholly accessible and thus more easily acted upon. 

--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
Brooklyn, NY
512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
Brooklyn, NY
512-560-2302





--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
Brooklyn, NY
512-560-2302




--
Regards,

Barrett Brown
Brooklyn, NY
512-560-2302