| Subject: Re: NYT story |
| From: Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> |
| Date: 4/5/10, 11:10 |
| To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
Exactly, I want it to be shown early on in the article that I'm a significant figure in the goings-on as I want to be a "spokesman" for a certain view of the internet and certain cultures associated with it, etc.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
OK! You're right -- and the "Anti-War" venue is actually good branding for you, even if people don't take the time to listen to the piece.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm linking to both now, and the radio interview has a lot of content that I'm proud of and which provide important information on the topic even if I do talk too fast at certain times.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
If I were you, I would promote the previous pieces on T/S rather than the radio interview (which wasn't your best performance). Didn't you have the other links on an earlier version?
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
It's a different incident, and possibly worse. See update at top of T/S.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
I think in your blurb you should mention the fact that they dug bullets out of the women's bodies as part of the coverup. That seems particularly egregious.