Re: NYT story
Subject: Re: NYT story
From: Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com>
Date: 4/5/10, 11:04
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>

OK! You're right -- and the "Anti-War" venue is actually good branding for you, even if people don't take the time to listen to the piece.

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm linking to both now, and the radio interview has a lot of content that I'm proud of and which provide important information on the topic even if I do talk too fast at certain times.


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
If I were you, I would promote the previous pieces on T/S rather than the radio interview (which wasn't your best performance). Didn't you have the other links on an earlier version?


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
It's a different incident, and possibly worse. See update at top of T/S.


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
I think in your blurb you should mention the fact that they dug bullets out of the women's bodies as part of the coverup. That seems particularly egregious.