Re: True/Slant pays me more than most others!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow! I like the name Project 3Jane. And interesting to get Coates Bateman involved. Whose idea was that?

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

No one cares; all the editors make fun of the parent company. Hogan knows about how it took them 3 months to pay me for the Krauthammer article due to incompetence at billing. But I'm not really in the habit of calling out Conde Nast and won't be doing it again so let's move back to a more important subject -

Going to talk to Coates Bateman today and give him a heads-up on Project 3Jane (official title of the media thing); will note that myself, Charles Johnson, and Kilkenny are all involved. Might set up a meeting between him and Stein and I and see if there's any way that we could all benefit from this, perhaps run the alpha version on the site for all the bloggers or something. We'll see.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, but not sure you should call out Conde Nast in print again in the future?

Biting the hand that feeds you?

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

Check this out; disgruntled T/S writer just screwed himself over:

http://davidappell.blogspot.com/2010/01/trueslant-abuses-writers.html

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:

That is VERY cool -- shows they expect a lot of you, and they are right!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

Just found out/verified that most others are just getting $200 a month base, whereas I get $250.