Re: Fame Us
Subject: Re: Fame Us
From: "Ava K Lamb" <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com>
Date: 1/8/10, 19:32
To: "Barret Brown" <barriticus@gmail.com>
Reply-To:
tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com

If I'm there at 8 is that too late

Sent via Kalicopometer by AT&T

From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:29:47 -0500
To: <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fame Us

Groovy, that Harry fellow (the animator) won't be by for another half an hour anyway and he's the one you and I would be working more closely with anyway.

This Aida woman apparently runs her own fucking magazine. It's amazing that she's over here jumping on our ship. Apparently she's a workaholic or something. She also likes our mag as it exists now, which amazes me because I don't.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Ava K Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:
I am still coming, just got held up trying to get a check from my former employer (it didn't clear, had the bank call her ECT) so I'm late. Coming there from the east village

Sent via Kalicopometer by AT&T

From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:20:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Fame Us

You still coming by? I wanted you to meet Aida if possible. It's no big deal, though.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:
awesome,
thanks!



On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
Oops, he's changing it right now. Name defaults to Scallywag.


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:
i dont see my name on the article, am i missing that?
i wanted my name on it


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ava K Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:
Wow,
Lots to look forward to,
Besides death and taxes....
Hehe

Sent via Kalicopometer by AT&T

From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:34:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Fame Us

Okay, it's up on the front page, name in lights, etc. Next time it won't be so exciting; you'll have to have bigger venues, more praise and links to your piece; then you won't be happy until you've got a book deal; then that won't do it for you and you'll want another, bigger book deal; meanwhile Vanity Fair doesn't do it for you anymore, either, and you're running out of bigger magazines to conquer. Then you'll go on TV and that will satisfy you for about ten minutes. Next you'll be drinking heavily and trying to find charismatic girls to host your own television show because nothing is ever enough and not enough people know your name yet. Have fun!


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I think he thought of one anyway. 


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:
yeah, ive been having trouble thinking of a real ringer title. i think double standards or re orientation make sense, but they dont really adress the inciting matter


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
He's putting it up now; trying to think of a catchy title.


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:
not posting my article yet is like that tantric christmas.
tell santa im waiting. i want to see my name in lights.

pixles. pixel lights.