Re: Fame Us

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:

i dont see my name on the article, am i missing that?
i wanted my name on it

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ava K Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow,
Lots to look forward to,
Besides death and taxes....
Hehe
Sent via Kalicopometer by AT&T

From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:34:27 -0500
To: Ava K. Lamb<tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fame Us

Okay, it's up on the front page, name in lights, etc. Next time it won't be so exciting; you'll have to have bigger venues, more praise and links to your piece; then you won't be happy until you've got a book deal; then that won't do it for you and you'll want another, bigger book deal; meanwhile Vanity Fair doesn't do it for you anymore, either, and you're running out of bigger magazines to conquer. Then you'll go on TV and that will satisfy you for about ten minutes. Next you'll be drinking heavily and trying to find charismatic girls to host your own television show because nothing is ever enough and not enough people know your name yet. Have fun!

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I think he thought of one anyway.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:

yeah, ive been having trouble thinking of a real ringer title. i think double standards or re orientation make sense, but they dont really adress the inciting matter

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

He's putting it up now; trying to think of a catchy title.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ava K. Lamb <tooth.radish.ava.stove@gmail.com> wrote:

not posting my article yet is like that tantric christmas.
tell santa im waiting. i want to see my name in lights.

pixles. pixel lights.