| Subject: Re: Huh? |
| From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> |
| Date: 11/13/09, 10:34 |
| To: Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> |
Yes, but for the future I think it's just more tasteful not to talk about those things. Let the aura of mystery surround you (especially when it's a false positive!)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I'll e-mail the editor and see what can be done. I'd like to leave in my two given names, if you don't mind.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can't delete the whole thing (which would be classier), then yes, delete those names.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
How about I have him take out the words Bush, Wily, and McCutchin?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
In fact, can you ask the BushBK guy to delete your comment?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Huh?
To: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Just don't put those names in print again.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
I know. The person is crazy. I'm well aware of what Kim's income is and how he lives.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
WELL, PLEASE DON'T PUT ALL THOSE NAMES IN PRINT AGAIN, OKAY?P.S. Wait until you see how Kim's living -- it's pretty obvious his monthly income is probably less than $1000 a month, so don't count on the inheritance being anything significant.On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:
If some deranged stalker is going to accuse me of being rich, I'm going to run with it.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Karen Lancaster <lancaster.karen@gmail.com> wrote:
Ive never tried to hide the fact that Im the heir to the Wily-Bush-Brown-Lancaster-McCutchin fortune, Peter.