Re: Religion
Subject: Re: Religion
From: Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com>
Date: 10/23/09, 05:37
To: Darleen Click <darleen@darleenclick.com>

http://www.skeptic.com/

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Darleen Click <darleen@darleenclick.com> wrote:

Shot myself in the foot?

 

No, I think not, dearest. To paraphrase, those that deny God don’t believe in nothing, they will believe in anything.

 

Does the name “Johnny Walker Lindh” mean ring a bell?

 

Kisses,

 

Darleen

 


From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:27 AM
To: Darleen Click
Subject: Re: Religion

 

Wow, you really shot yourself in the foot with this sweat lodge thing. Better luck next post, sweetheart.

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Barrett Brown <barriticus@gmail.com> wrote:

I don't see how anything in this paragraph implies a desire to have religion "banned from the public square altogether." Which clause are you thinking of in particular? 

 

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Darleen Click <darleen@darleenclick.com> wrote:

Barrett,

 

“We oppose all governmental programs, violations and special rights for religious individuals, groups and organizations. These include private school vouchers, organized prayers in public venues, the faith-based initiatives and laws exempting the religious from abiding by federal and state civil rights, health and safety laws.”

 

If you do not abide by this principle of a group you are affiliated with I will retract my assertion. As I read this paragraph, it is hostile to faith and organized religion in particular. I am open to your disabusing me of my conclusion.

 

Sincerely,

 

Darleen

 


From: Barrett Brown [mailto:barriticus@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 4:56 AM
To: Darleen Click
Subject: Religion

 

Would you please identify where I've said or implied that I would "like religion banned from the public square altogether," as you claimed last night?

 

Thanks,

 

Barrett Brown